Rabobank sustainability score: 32/100

48th of 61 in Financial Services / Banking on this question

Rabobank publishes operational GHG data via its Annual Report 2024, which is CSRD-aligned (page 48 onward). DitchCarbon, citing Rabobank's own reporting, shows 2024 Scope 1 and 2 combined at approximately 69,000 tonnes CO2e (69 million kg), down from ~73,000 tonnes in 2023. The 2022 breakdown showed Scope 1 at ~19,800t and Scope 2 at ~26,600t. No granular 2024 split between Scope 1 and Scope 2 was publicly accessible in search results, and third-party assurance status of operational figures was not confirmed. The data is disclosed per GHG Protocol methodology but lacks independently verified granular breakdown by facility. A score of 6 would require confirmed third-party verification; 5 reflects full Scope 1+2 disclosure with GHG Protocol alignment but insufficient evidence of independent assurance.

Joint 24th of 61 in Financial Services / Banking on this question

Rabobank's dominant environmental impact is its financed emissions (Scope 3 Category 15). In 2023, Scope 3 financed emissions were reported at approximately 46.9 billion kg CO2e (~46.9 Mt), derived from Rabobank's own PCAF-aligned GHG inventory covering 87% of material on-balance-sheet lending activities as of 2023 (51.5 Mt CO2e gross disclosed). The 2022 climate plan disclosed 46.3 Mt CO2e for 85% of material lending. Rabobank has mapped 12 sector/region combinations for reduction targets and is expanding coverage toward 100% by 2025. Methodology challenges remain, particularly for agricultural portfolios where PCAF standards are still maturing. The disclosed figure is large, partially verified, and expanding — but not yet at full coverage or independently audited. No SBTi validated financed emissions target exists.

Joint 27th of 61 in Financial Services / Banking on this question

Operational Scope 1+2 emissions declined from ~82,700 tonnes in 2020 to ~58,100 tonnes in 2022, then rose to ~73,000 tonnes in 2023 before falling back to ~69,000 tonnes in 2024. This trajectory is volatile with no confirmed consistent multi-year decline. More critically, the bank's financed emissions — the overwhelmingly dominant impact — are not showing verified year-on-year absolute reductions. The 2024 Annual Report discloses sector-level pathways under the 'Road to Paris' framework but reduction targets are portfolio-intensity-based across 12 sector/region combinations, not absolute financed-emission reductions. BankTrack/BOCC 2025 confirmed $13.9 billion in fossil fuel financing between 2021–2024, including $3.8 billion in 2024 alone. The physical trajectory of Rabobank's most material impact (financed emissions) cannot be confirmed as declining in absolute terms.

Joint 45th of 61 in Financial Services / Banking on this question

Rabobank's operational energy consumption is moderate for a bank of its size (~47,000 employees, largely office-based). The bank has reduced its operational emissions substantially since 2018 (per its 2022 climate plan), consistent with some renewable energy transition in its office estate. However, no specific renewable energy percentage for operational electricity was found in public disclosures reviewed. Rabobank's supplier sustainability statement (effective 2025) references fossil fuel thresholds and CSRD alignment but does not confirm a specific RE100 membership or 100% renewable electricity commitment for own operations. No PPA or on-site generation evidence found. A score of 4 reflects reasonable energy efficiency progress and moderate energy consumption footprint, but absence of confirmed high-percentage renewable target or verified green tariff.

Joint 7th of 61 in Financial Services / Banking on this question

Rabobank has material nature exposure through its dominant food and agriculture lending portfolio. It is a TNFD taskforce member, signed the Finance for Biodiversity Pledge in 2020, and conducted a nature footprint analysis of its private sector loan portfolio (63% of total assets), finding 85% of covered assets are highly dependent on ecosystem services. It has defined SMART nature targets aligned with the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework and published a global nature vision. However, a 2023 Greenpeace/Profundo report assessed environmental damage linked to Rabobank's financing of Brazilian forest-risk activities at €66–459 billion, and a Forests & Finance report (2025) identified Rabobank as a financier of Bunge's forest-risk soy operations. The gap between commitments and continued financing of deforestation-linked companies limits the score. TNFD membership and SMART targets are positive, but financed deforestation exposure remains documented and ongoing.

Joint 20th of 61 in Financial Services / Banking on this question

Rabobank is a service business; its own material footprint is primarily IT hardware, office supplies, and paper. There is evidence of a circular IT procurement programme (partnership with Closing the Loop for mobile phone waste compensation), awareness of circular economy principles, and active client advisory work on circularity. No quantified internal waste metrics, circular targets, or office recycling rates were found in publicly available reports. The Closing the Loop partnership demonstrates meaningful intent on e-waste but is limited in scale (~575 kg e-waste saved). For a bank of this size, the internal circular programme is visible but not comprehensively reported.

Joint 18th of 61 in Financial Services / Banking on this question

Rabobank's own operational water consumption is low and typical of an office-based bank. No specific operational water consumption data was found in any public report reviewed. The bank's most material water impact is through its financed agricultural portfolio, where 85% of covered assets are highly dependent on ecosystem services including water availability. Rabobank's double materiality assessment identified water as a focus area alongside land use and pollution, and it launched a 'WaterBank' cooperative initiative in 2024. However, no quantified water footprint, reduction targets, or water stewardship programme for own operations was publicly confirmed. For a bank whose primary water exposure is through lending, the score of 4 reflects awareness and portfolio-level engagement without verified quantified outcomes.

Joint 29th of 61 in Financial Services / Banking on this question

Rabobank has no SBTi validated or committed targets for either operational or financed emissions as of the research date — DitchCarbon (citing Rabobank's own reporting) explicitly states the bank has not set SBTi-aligned reduction commitments. Its 'Road to Paris' 2022 plan sets sector/region intensity pathways for 12 combinations using IEA NZE and SBTi-aligned methodologies as references, but these are self-set intensity targets, not SBTi validated absolute reductions. The bank has an aspiration to align all lending and investment with net-zero pathways by mid-century. For fossil fuel financing, the plan targets only a 20% volume reduction by 2030 vs 2022 — while allowing gas volumes to grow by 20% — which is weaker than a 1.5°C pathway. Carbon credits have been used since 2007 to offset residual operational emissions, quality unspecified. Self-set intensity targets with no SBTi validation and continued fossil fuel growth provisions score low.

Joint 27th of 61 in Financial Services / Banking on this question

Rabobank publishes an Annual Report and Impact Report annually, with FY2024 disclosures aligned to CSRD requirements (Sustainability Statements chapter, page 48+). It is subject to ECB supervision as a Significant Institution, publishes TCFD-aligned and TNFD-aligned disclosures, and has a dedicated sustainability strategy with board-level oversight. The 'Road to Paris' plan and its 2024 Addendum are publicly available. InfluenceMap gives Rabobank a C+ (73% organisation score) on sustainable finance policy engagement, noting engagement is primarily limited to high-level statements. Lobbying transparency is limited — Rabobank discloses some trade association memberships without full governance detail. Executive compensation linked to sustainability KPIs is referenced in the NZ subsidiary climate statements but not confirmed at group level. CSRD alignment and PCAF participation are positive; no mission-lock structure.

Joint 45th of 61 in Financial Services / Banking on this question

Start at 8. Rabobank is a major bank with material fossil fuel financing exposure. The 2025 Banking on Climate Chaos report (BankTrack/RAN/Oil Change International) found Rabobank provided $13.9 billion in fossil fuel financing between 2021 and 2024, including $3.8 billion in 2024 — with $352 million directed to companies actively expanding fossil fuels. This places Rabobank in the 'materially complicit' structural tier (−4): it is a national-dominant bank with documented fossil sector lending at material scale, but does not meet all four infrastructure criteria (it lacks global category dominance and Rabobank is not a payments network or clearing infrastructure). Additionally, a credible NGO report (Greenpeace/Profundo, 2023) documented extensive financing of Brazilian deforestation-linked activities with estimated societal damage of €66–459 billion, and a coalition of environmental groups documented $5.6 billion in financing to high-emission meat and dairy companies. These findings are from multiple independent sources. Positive climate advocacy (TNFD membership, Finance for Biodiversity Pledge, Road to Paris plan) is captured in Q5/Q8 and does not offset the structural deduction under rubric rules. No binding fossil-sector phase-out programme with verified timeline was found. Final: 8 − 4 = 4.