Jupiter Fund Management sustainability score: 33/100
Better than 43% of Financial Services / Banking
Making progress starts at 46. The highest score on SINK is 71.
Jupiter Fund Management is a UK-based active asset manager, with roots going back to 1985, with £465.7M revenue (FY2025) and ~468 staff. It operates across equities, bonds, and alternatives, serving institutional and retail clients globally from London headquarters.
Founded 2007Head office London, United KingdomStaff ~468Revenue £465.7M (FY2025; net revenue £431.0M)Website ↗
Jupiter's financed emissions rose 48% year-on-year to 26.2 MtCO2e while operational emissions fell marginally. Its net-zero 2050 commitment lacks validation; portfolio targets are under review. Disclosure is voluminous but contains unresolved contradictions and unassured figures.
Jupiter Fund Management scores 33/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Scores are free. Nobody can pay to change a score, speed it up or hide it. Last verified October 2026.
That places Jupiter Fund Management joint 629th of 1,023 companies scored, and joint 33rd of 61 in Financial Services / Banking.
What is Jupiter Fund Management doing well, and where does it fall short?
Strongest on Carbon Footprint: Operations and Energy Source (8/10, 6/10). Weakest on Emissions Trajectory and Resource Use & Waste (2/10, 3/10).
Where Jupiter Fund Management lost points
For each question that lost points, the evidence our public rubric looks for that we didn't find.
What would raise this score
- Whether its emissions are fallingShow its emissions are falling.
- How it uses materials and handles wasteShow active waste reduction, reuse or repair.
- Its climate targetsSet specific targets with dates.
Every question that lost points
- Emissions from its own operations8/10No verified figures published with their method and a falling trend.
- Emissions from its supply chain5/10Most of its supply-chain (Scope 3) emissions aren't measured.
- Whether its emissions are falling2/10No evidence its emissions are falling.
- How clean its energy is6/10Less than 90% of its energy shown to be renewable.
- Its effect on nature4/10Its effect on nature isn't measured or independently verified.
- How it uses materials and handles waste3/10No active waste reduction, reuse or repair shown.
- Its effect on water4/10No measured water footprint with reduction targets.
- Its climate targets3/10No specific targets with dates.
- How openly it reports6/10No annual impact report, or no pay linked to climate targets.
- Its record on controversies5/10Points deducted for controversies or its business model. The finding is under question 10.
A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Anyone can send us new evidence, free. How to send it.
How is Jupiter Fund Management's SINK score calculated?
Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleWhat evidence is Jupiter Fund Management's score based on?
10 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which of the ten questions it informed.
50% of them were published by Jupiter Fund Management itself; the rest come from independent sources.
“Total Scope 1 and 2 (location-based) 257 34 291 268 44 312”
“For listed equities and corporate bonds, calculations have transitioned from a market capitalisation basis to an Enterprise Value Including Cash (EVIC) basis, with prior-year figures restated accordingly.”
“Activities and Outcomes Report, Sustainability Report and Pay Gap Report”
“Jupiter’s 2025 Sustainability Report includes our Group-level disclosures on the recommendations of the Taskforce for Climate-related Finance Disclosure (TCFD)”
“In 2021, Jupiter signed the Finance for Biodiversity (FfB) Pledge.”
“scoring a B for Climate, as well as being recognised for awareness of Forest issues and Water security, scoring a C in both categories”
“switching to renewable electricity, enhancing our recycling and waste management, promoting greener travel”
“Jupiter Asset Management has backed a landmark shareholder resolution calling on Barclays to stop financing fossil fuel producers”
“Jupiter Fund Management has committed to net zero emissions by 2050 across its full range of investments and operations”
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Is this your company? Claim this profile (free)
Use this score in tenders
Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.
Open the score sheet →Send new evidence, free
Scored low because little is published? Publish what you do and send us the link, free. If it holds up, your score changes, and the change is logged on your page.
How to send evidence →Put your score on your website, free
It shows the current band, sector rank and score, and links to this page, so it changes when the score does.
Track this score
Bidding for a public contract? Check if you need a Carbon Reduction Plan, free →
Want your own page like this?
Free, independent, every source shown. Send it to any buyer who asks about your sustainability.
How does Jupiter Fund Management compare with other financial services / banking companies?
Where Jupiter Fund Management sits among financial services / banking peers.
Among the 61 major financial services / banking brands we've scored, Jupiter Fund Management is tied =33rd of 61, with 2 others.
Who scores higher in Financial Services / Banking?
The 3 companies in the sector scoring nearest above Jupiter Fund Management.
Aberdeen is a £511bn asset manager with operational emissions down 74–80% since 2018, but this masks a fundamental problem: financed emissions of ~111.7 billion kg CO₂e dwarf operational progress.
See the breakdown →Investec discloses operational emissions and has joined RE100, but financed emissions rose 65% year-over-year with no SBTi validation.
See the breakdown →A Union of Concerned Scientists letter, citing Banking on Climate Chaos, calls Citi the second-largest fossil-fuel financier since the Paris Agreement.
See the breakdown →Which companies moved this week, and why.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
We'll send one email to confirm. No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Checking a company?
Search free →Asked to prove you're sustainable?
Get your business scored, free →Been scored?
Find your page and claim it, free →Scores are free. Nobody can pay to change a score, speed it up or hide it.