Triodos is a rare banker with genuine climate substance: 28% financed emissions cuts verified, SBTi-validated near-term targets, and credible refusal of offsets. It left the Net Zero Banking Alliance when standards weakened. Main weaknesses: biodiversity targets only set in 2024, water and circular economy programmes lack public granularity, and executive remuneration is not formally tied to sustainability KPIs.
Same formula for every company. No curve. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleStrongest on Controversies & Red Flags and Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain (9/10, 8/10). Weakest on Water Impact and Resource Use & Waste (5/10, 6/10).
17 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which rubric questions it informed.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Among the 27 major financial services / banking brands we've scored, Triodos Bank sits 1st of 27.
Score history begins 9 April 2026.
As Triodos Bank's score updates, the trajectory will appear here.
We're backfilling historical scores for FTSE 100 and S&P 100 companies over the coming weeks.
Every challenge is published. We'd rather be corrected than wrong — that's the whole point.
No challenges submitted yet. If you have evidence that contradicts this score, you can challenge any question above — cite a public source and we'll review it.
Triodos Bank, founded 1976, is a Dutch ethical bank offering retail and corporate banking focused on sustainable finance. It refuses fossil fuel lending, discloses 100% of financed emissions via PCAF methodology, and manages €10+ billion in assets. A sector outlier in climate rigour and transparency.
Instructive contrast: major universal bank with similar financed emissions disclosure scope but weaker absolute reduction track record and offset reliance.
View breakdown →European peer bank with comparable TCFD and PCAF commitments but lower transparency on financed emissions reductions and weaker fossil fuel restrictions.
View breakdown →Global investment bank with stronger assets under management but no equivalent commitment to absolute financed emissions reduction without offsets.
View breakdown →Ethical positioning claims similar to Triodos but less rigorous fossil fuel divestment and weaker PCAF-aligned disclosure of financed emissions.
View breakdown →Email alerts when a rubric question is verified, a challenge is resolved, or the overall score changes.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Readers and institutions support our work. Companies can pay to submit evidence we couldn't find. Neither type of payment changes a score.