Food & Beverage (non-meat)

Tony's Chocolonely sustainability score: 55/100

55/100
Making progress
Joint 2nd of 51 in Food & Beverage (non-meat)

Better than 96% of Food & Beverage (non-meat)

Leading practice starts at 60. The highest score on SINK is 71.

Is this your company? Claim this profile (free)

About Tony's Chocolonely

Tony's Chocolonely is a Dutch chocolate company headquartered in Amsterdam. The company specializes in fair-trade chocolate with a stated mission to combat child labor and exploitation in cocoa farming.

More about Tony's Chocolonely

It operates via a unique Mission Lock legal structure and holds B Corp certification.

Head office Amsterdam, NetherlandsStaff Not published in a source we could readRevenue ~€240M (2024/25, reported by Confectionery Production)Website ↗

Our verdict

Tony's Chocolonely demonstrates strong supply chain transparency and deforestation-free sourcing through satellite mapping of 29,326+ farms, but absolute emissions figures remain unpublished despite SBTi commitments. Revenue growth of 60% in two years undermines credibility of claimed emission reductions. The Barry Callebaut partnership, removal from Slave Free Chocolate list, and reliance on offsets are unresolved weaknesses.

Tony's Chocolonely scores 55/100 (Making progress) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Scores are free. Nobody can pay to change a score, speed it up or hide it. Last verified November 2026.

That places Tony's Chocolonely joint 56th of 1,023 companies scored, and joint 2nd of 51 in Food & Beverage (non-meat).

The ten questions

What is Tony's Chocolonely doing well, and where does it fall short?

Strongest on Transparency & Accountability and Nature & Biodiversity Impact (8/10, 7/10). Weakest on Carbon Footprint: Operations and Emissions Trajectory (4/10, 4/10).

What's missing

Where Tony's Chocolonely lost points

For each question that lost points, the evidence our public rubric looks for that we didn't find.

What would raise this score

  • Emissions from its own operationsPublish full Scope 1 and 2 figures worked out to the GHG Protocol.
  • Whether its emissions are fallingShow a year-on-year fall in its total emissions.
  • Its effect on waterMeasure its water footprint and set reduction targets.

Every question that lost points

  • Emissions from its own operations4/10No full Scope 1 and 2 figures worked out to the GHG Protocol.
  • Emissions from its supply chain6/10No full value-chain map or supplier engagement programme.
  • Whether its emissions are falling4/10No evidence of a year-on-year fall in its total emissions.
  • How clean its energy is6/10Less than 90% of its energy shown to be renewable.
  • Its effect on nature7/10No verified restoration beyond its own footprint, or supply chain not mapped for nature risk.
  • How it uses materials and handles waste5/10No measurable waste or recycling targets reported publicly.
  • Its effect on water4/10No measured water footprint with reduction targets.
  • Its climate targets7/10No validated long-term net zero target.
  • How openly it reports8/10No shareholder vote on climate, or not everything publicly verifiable.
  • Its record on controversies6/10Points deducted for controversies or its business model. The finding is under question 10.

A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Anyone can send us new evidence, free. How to send it.

The calculation

How is Tony's Chocolonely's SINK score calculated?

Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.

SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × Scale
Industry base impact
Food & Beverage (non-meat) sector ceiling.
50 / 100
Performance score
Sum of the ten questions, each scored 0 to 10.
57 / 100
Raw score
Weighted average before scale penalty.
(0.3 × 50) + (0.7 × 57) = 54.9
Scale penalty
Multiplier based on total emissions. Bigger polluters lose more.
× 1
Final score
Rounded. Making progress.
55 / 100
Where the evidence comes from

What evidence is Tony's Chocolonely's score based on?

13 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which of the ten questions it informed.

15% of them were published by Tony's Chocolonely itself; the rest come from independent sources.

Scored on 4 April 2026 under an earlier version of our method. We're re-checking it under the current method.

11 of 13 sources are independent of the company.

[2]Independent source
Komoneed: Tony's Chocolonely Brand Profile
Unknown
Q1Q4Q6Q7
View →
[3]Public record
Sustainability-Beat: Tony's Chocolonely 2024 Report
2024
Q2Q3
View →
[4]Public record
Sustainable Brands: Tony's Chocolonely Scales Impact
Unknown
Q2
View →
[5]Independent source
Satelligence: Partnership with Tony's Chocolonely
Unknown
Q2Q5
View →
[6]Public record
Confectionery News: Tony's Chocolonely Record Growth and Cocoa Exploitation
2025
Q3
View →
[7]Public record
Confectionery News: Most Ethical Chocolate Brands 2025 Global Chocolate Scorecard
2025
Q5
View →
[8]Self-reported
Tony's Chocolonely: Official Blog on Chocolate Scorecard
Unknown
Q5
View →
[9]Independent source
IIED: Tony's Chocolonely Holistic Approach to Sustainable Chocolate
Unknown
Q7Q8
View →
[10]Third-party verified
B Lab: Tony's Chocolonely B Corp Certification
Ongoing
Q9
View →
[11]Self-reported
Schuttelaar & Partners: Tony's Chocolonely Sustainability Strategy Foundation
Unknown
Q9
View →
[12]Public record
Confectionery News: Tony's Chocolonely Mission Lock Legal Structure
2023
Q9
View →
[13]Public record
Food Navigator: Tony's Chocolonely Axed from Slave Free Chocolate List
2021
Q10
View →
[14]Public record
Food Digital: Tony's Chocoloney Sales Surge and Cocoa Concern
Unknown
Q10
View →

If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.

For Tony's Chocolonely

Is this your company? Claim this profile (free)

Free. Once you confirm, this page says “Profile claimed by Tony's Chocolonely” and we email you when the score changes. Claiming changes nothing about the score. More than one person can claim a company. Privacy

  • Use this score in tenders

    Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.

    Open the score sheet →
  • Send new evidence, free

    Scored low because little is published? Publish what you do and send us the link, free. If it holds up, your score changes, and the change is logged on your page.

    How to send evidence →
  • Put your score on your website, free

    It shows the current band, sector rank and score, and links to this page, so it changes when the score does.

    Tony's Chocolonely: SINK sustainability score 55.

Track this score

We'll send one email to confirm. Every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy

Bidding for a public contract? Check if you need a Carbon Reduction Plan, free →

We reply within 5 working days.

Want your own page like this?

Free, independent, every source shown. Send it to any buyer who asks about your sustainability.

Score my business free
Tony's Chocolonely in context

How does Tony's Chocolonely compare with other food & beverage (non-meat) companies?

Where Tony's Chocolonely sits among food & beverage (non-meat) peers.

Among the 51 major food & beverage (non-meat) brands we've scored, Tony's Chocolonely is tied =2nd of 51, with 1 other.

=2/51
Tony's Chocolonely's rank
41
Industry average
19
Industry low
58
Industry high
See all 51 in Food & Beverage (non-meat) →
THE SUNDAY RUNDOWN

Which companies moved this week, and why.

One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.

We'll send one email to confirm. No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

Checking a company?

Search free →

Asked to prove you're sustainable?

Get your business scored, free →

Been scored?

Find your page and claim it, free →

Scores are free. Nobody can pay to change a score, speed it up or hide it.