StoneX sustainability score: 20/100
Better than 0% of Financial Services / Banking
Below expectations starts at 31. The highest score on SINK is 71.
StoneX Group is a US financial services firm providing execution, clearing and risk management in agricultural, energy, metals and financial markets; its roots go back to a firm established by Saul Stone in 1924. It had about 5,400 employees and $132.4 billion in FY2025 revenue, which includes physical commodity sales.
Founded 1987Head office New York, NY, United StatesStaff ~5,400 (FY2025)Revenue $132,378M revenues (FY2025)Website ↗
StoneX publishes almost no environmental data that we could read: no emissions figures, renewable-energy use or nature-risk information, and no financed or facilitated emissions for its commodity and brokerage business. Its annual report says it is building measurement of its office and data-centre footprint. Board oversight of sustainability exists, but its sustainability report was not readable to us.
StoneX scores 20/100 (Significant gaps) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Scores are free. Nobody can pay to change a score, speed it up or hide it. Last verified October 2026.
That places StoneX joint 973rd of 1,023 companies scored, and joint 59th of 61 in Financial Services / Banking.
What is StoneX doing well, and where does it fall short?
Strongest on Transparency & Accountability and Controversies & Red Flags (5/10, 5/10). Weakest on Carbon Footprint: Supply Chain and Emissions Trajectory (1/10, 1/10).
Where StoneX lost points
For each question that lost points, the evidence our public rubric looks for that we didn't find.
What would raise this score
- Emissions from its supply chainAssess where its supply-chain emissions come from.
- Whether its emissions are fallingShow its emissions are falling, even from energy bills or mileage.
- How clean its energy isMove to a renewable energy tariff or make a major efficiency investment.
Every question that lost points
- Emissions from its own operations2/10No emissions figures for its own operations, not even an estimate from energy bills.
- Emissions from its supply chain1/10No assessment of where its supply-chain emissions come from.
- Whether its emissions are falling1/10No evidence its emissions are falling, not even from energy bills or mileage.
- How clean its energy is1/10No renewable energy tariff or major efficiency investment shown.
- Its effect on nature1/10No evidence it knows its main risks to nature.
- How it uses materials and handles waste1/10No recycling or waste reduction shown.
- Its effect on water1/10No figures for its water use.
- Its climate targets2/10No specific targets with dates.
- How openly it reports5/10No dedicated sustainability role, board oversight or public report.
- Its record on controversies5/10Points deducted for controversies or its business model. The finding is under question 10.
A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Anyone can send us new evidence, free. How to send it.
How is StoneX's SINK score calculated?
Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleWhat evidence is StoneX's score based on?
9 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which of the ten questions it informed.
0% of them were published by StoneX itself; the rest come from independent sources.
“with the largest concentrations in agricultural and energy commodities (consisting primarily of grains, energy and renewable fuels, coffee, sugar, cotton, and food service)”
“We are building on our efforts to measure our carbon footprint, identifying reduction opportunities across our offices and data centers”
“In August 2024, the Company delivered on its commitment to share its efforts by releasing a stand-alone Sustainability Report”
“From improving energy efficiency across our offices to exploring sustainable procurement practices, we are committed to minimizing our impact on the planet”
“Energy refiners, distributors, producers to energy traders and ESG fund managers are among the users of these products.”
“A reasonable chunk of its revenues is from corporates for commodities trading and hedging for the likes of corn, wheat, soy and energy.”
“These contracts span markets that include sustainable energy, carbon emissions, renewable fuels, and pollutants such as sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide.”
“StoneX recently became a member of the Nodal Exchange, which offers renewable fuels and pollutants contracts”
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Is this your company? Claim this profile (free)
Use this score in tenders
Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.
Open the score sheet →Send new evidence, free
Scored low because little is published? Publish what you do and send us the link, free. If it holds up, your score changes, and the change is logged on your page.
How to send evidence →Put your score on your website, free
It shows the current band, sector rank and score, and links to this page, so it changes when the score does.
Track this score
Bidding for a public contract? Check if you need a Carbon Reduction Plan, free →
Want your own page like this?
Free, independent, every source shown. Send it to any buyer who asks about your sustainability.
How does StoneX compare with other financial services / banking companies?
StoneX is tied at the bottom of the financial services / banking pack.
Among the 61 major financial services / banking brands we've scored, StoneX is tied =59th of 61, with 2 others.
Who scores higher in Financial Services / Banking?
The 3 companies in the sector scoring nearest above StoneX.
Freddie Mac publishes no emissions data for its operations or its mortgage book, and no reduction targets; its last sustainability report covered 2023 and its ESG web page was removed in 2025.
See the breakdown →Coutts publishes no emissions figures of its own and no figure for the emissions it finances: its climate reporting sits with NatWest Group, which does not count for Coutts here.
See the breakdown →Fannie Mae discloses no operational or financed emissions despite guaranteeing $4.1 trillion in mortgages.
See the breakdown →Which companies moved this week, and why.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
We'll send one email to confirm. No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Checking a company?
Search free →Asked to prove you're sustainable?
Get your business scored, free →Been scored?
Find your page and claim it, free →Scores are free. Nobody can pay to change a score, speed it up or hide it.