Financial Services / Banking

IG Group sustainability score: 34/100

34/100
Below expectations
Joint 28th of 61 in Financial Services / Banking

Better than 48% of Financial Services / Banking

Making progress starts at 46. The highest score on SINK is 71.

Limited independent evidence: only two independent sources cover this company. The score may change as more evidence appears.

Is this your company? Claim this profile (free)

About IG Group

IG Group is a London-based online financial services company founded in 1974, offering CFD and derivatives trading to retail and institutional clients. With approximately 2,400 employees, it operates as a standalone broker with no lending book, insurance portfolio, or fossil fuel financing exposure.

More about IG Group

A pure-play retail derivatives platform with minimal direct environmental footprint.

Founded 1974Head office London, United KingdomStaff ~2,428Revenue ~£943MWebsite ↗

Read IG Group's own report ↗

Our verdict

IG Group discloses operational emissions with third-party assurance but absolute emissions are rising 13% year-on-year. No validated science-based targets exist; the sole quantified commitment is a 2.5% intensity reduction. Supply chain emissions remain largely unmanaged despite representing 35,000+ tCO2e annually. Renewable energy relies on unbundled certificates without additionality verification.

IG Group scores 34/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Scores are free. Nobody can pay to change a score, speed it up or hide it. Last verified August 2026.

That places IG Group joint 598th of 1,023 companies scored, and joint 28th of 61 in Financial Services / Banking.

The ten questions

What is IG Group doing well, and where does it fall short?

Strongest on Carbon Footprint: Operations and Controversies & Red Flags (8/10, 8/10). Weakest on Emissions Trajectory and Resource Use & Waste (2/10, 3/10).

What's missing

Where IG Group lost points

For each question that lost points, the evidence our public rubric looks for that we didn't find.

What would raise this score

  • Whether its emissions are fallingShow its emissions are falling.
  • How it uses materials and handles wasteShow active waste reduction, reuse or repair.
  • Its climate targetsSet specific targets with dates.

Every question that lost points

  • Emissions from its own operations8/10No verified figures published with their method and a falling trend.
  • Emissions from its supply chain5/10Most of its supply-chain (Scope 3) emissions aren't measured.
  • Whether its emissions are falling2/10No evidence its emissions are falling.
  • How clean its energy is5/10Less than half its energy shown to be renewable, or no transition plan.
  • Its effect on nature4/10Its effect on nature isn't measured or independently verified.
  • How it uses materials and handles waste3/10No active waste reduction, reuse or repair shown.
  • Its effect on water4/10No measured water footprint with reduction targets.
  • Its climate targets3/10No specific targets with dates.
  • How openly it reports6/10No annual impact report, or no pay linked to climate targets.

A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Anyone can send us new evidence, free. How to send it.

The calculation

How is IG Group's SINK score calculated?

Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.

SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × Scale
Industry base impact
Financial Services / Banking sector ceiling.
50 / 100
Performance score
Sum of the ten questions, each scored 0 to 10.
48 / 100
Raw score
Weighted average before scale penalty.
(0.3 × 50) + (0.7 × 48) = 48.6
Scale penalty
Multiplier based on total emissions. Bigger polluters lose more.
× 0.7
Financed emissions
Banks and insurers that don't publish the emissions of the lending, investment or insurance they finance get a size multiplier of no more than 0.70×. This company publishes no such figure, so the 0.70× floor applies.
Not published (0.70× floor)
Final score
Rounded. Below expectations.
34 / 100
Where the evidence comes from

What evidence is IG Group's score based on?

9 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which of the ten questions it informed.

67% of them were published by IG Group itself; the rest come from independent sources.

[1]Self-reported
Sustainability Addendum 2025

“Scope 1 (tCO2e) 180.8 … Scope 2 (tCO2e) 758.7 … Total Scope 1 and 2 (tCO2e) 939.5”

2025
Q1Q2Q4Q6Q7
View →
[2]Self-reported
FY23 PAS2060 Carbon Neutral Report

“The total carbon emissions for IG Group plc for the reporting period 1st June 2022 to 31st May 2023 is 25,186.20 tCO2e”

2023
Q1Q2Q3Q6Q8
View →
[3]Self-reported
IG Group Annual Report 2025

“green features such as 100% renewable electricity and LED lighting that cuts energy consumption by 45%”

2025
Q4Q8
View →
[4]Self-reported
IG Group Annual Report 2024

“We believe this means we must operate ethically, we must minimise our impact on the environment”

2024
Q5
View →
[5]Self-reported
IG Group Annual Report 2023

“The Brighter Future Framework is our ESG strategy. Launched in FY21, it identifies the key risks posed by our business”

2023
Q9
View →
[6]Self-reported
ESG Report 2022

“Formal commitment to the Science Based Target Initiative”

2022
Q8
View →
[7]Third-party verified
Science Based Targets initiative Target Dashboard

“The SBTi's Target Dashboard lists companies and financial institutions that have set science-based targets, or have committed to developing targets.”

Ongoing
Q8
View →
[8]Independent source
InfluenceMap Global Leaders in Climate Policy Engagement 2024

“An independent think tank producing data-driven analysis on how business and finance are impacting the climate crisis”

2024
Q10
View →
[9]Public record
IG Group Wikipedia entry

“IG Group Holdings plc … Industry: Financial services … Services: OTC; EDT; Stock trading”

Unknown
Q10
View →

If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.

For IG

Is this your company? Claim this profile (free)

Free. Once you confirm, this page says “Profile claimed by IG Group” and we email you when the score changes. Claiming changes nothing about the score. More than one person can claim a company. Privacy

  • Use this score in tenders

    Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.

    Open the score sheet →
  • Send new evidence, free

    Scored low because little is published? Publish what you do and send us the link, free. If it holds up, your score changes, and the change is logged on your page.

    How to send evidence →
  • Put your score on your website, free

    It shows the current band, sector rank and score, and links to this page, so it changes when the score does.

    IG Group: SINK sustainability score 34.

Track this score

We'll send one email to confirm. Every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy

Bidding for a public contract? Check if you need a Carbon Reduction Plan, free →

We reply within 5 working days.

Want your own page like this?

Free, independent, every source shown. Send it to any buyer who asks about your sustainability.

Score my business free
IG Group in context

How does IG Group compare with other financial services / banking companies?

Where IG Group sits among financial services / banking peers.

Among the 61 major financial services / banking brands we've scored, IG Group is tied =28th of 61, with 4 others.

=28/61
IG Group's rank
36
Industry average
20
Industry low
65
Industry high
See all 61 in Financial Services / Banking →
THE SUNDAY RUNDOWN

Which companies moved this week, and why.

One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.

We'll send one email to confirm. No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

Checking a company?

Search free →

Asked to prove you're sustainable?

Get your business scored, free →

Been scored?

Find your page and claim it, free →

Scores are free. Nobody can pay to change a score, speed it up or hide it.