Too Good To Go sustainability score: 41/100
Better than 28% of E-commerce / Online Retail
Making progress starts at 46. The highest score on SINK is 71.
Too Good To Go operates a surplus-food marketplace app connecting consumers with discounted meals from restaurants and retailers, plus a Parcels service selling excess stock from partner brands. Based in Copenhagen, the company operates across 21 markets with €249.3M revenue (FY2025) and 1,322 employees.
More about Too Good To Go
It is a certified B Corp.
Head office Copenhagen, DenmarkStaff ~1,322 (2025)Revenue €249.3M revenue (FY2025)Website ↗
Too Good To Go's annual report puts surplus meals saved at 157 million in 2025. It has no emissions targets, no SBTi commitment and no renewable energy strategy, and its total emissions rose about 19% year-on-year to 24,469 tonnes. The company links the rise to its Parcels business.
Too Good To Go scores 41/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Scores are free. Nobody can pay to change a score, speed it up or hide it. Last verified November 2026.
That places Too Good To Go joint 390th of 1,023 companies scored, and joint 18th of 26 in E-commerce / Online Retail.
What is Too Good To Go doing well, and where does it fall short?
Strongest on Controversies & Red Flags and Carbon Footprint: Operations (9/10, 6/10). Weakest on Emissions Trajectory and Energy Source (0/10, 1/10).
Where Too Good To Go lost points
For each question that lost points, the evidence our public rubric looks for that we didn't find.
What would raise this score
- Whether its emissions are fallingShow its emissions are falling.
- How clean its energy isMove to a renewable energy tariff or make a major efficiency investment.
- Its climate targetsSet emissions reduction targets.
Every question that lost points
- Emissions from its own operations6/10Its own emissions aren't independently verified or tracked over several years.
- Emissions from its supply chain6/10No full value-chain map or supplier engagement programme.
- Whether its emissions are falling0/10No evidence its emissions are falling.
- How clean its energy is1/10No renewable energy tariff or major efficiency investment shown.
- Its effect on nature3/10No assessment of its effect on nature, and no basic environmental policy.
- How it uses materials and handles waste6/10No verified figures for reuse and recycling across the business.
- Its effect on water3/10No monitoring of water use, or no measures to reduce it.
- Its climate targets1/10No emissions reduction targets.
- How openly it reports6/10No shareholder vote on climate, or not everything publicly verifiable.
A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Anyone can send us new evidence, free. How to send it.
How is Too Good To Go's SINK score calculated?
Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleHas Too Good To Go's score changed?
Too Good To Go's score has moved from 53 to 41 across 2 recorded reviews, down 12 points.
- 53 → 41-126 November 2026
Re-scored under the current method. Sector moved from SaaS / Digital Services to E-commerce / Online Retail by majority revenue (96.4%), which lowers the base from 70 to 40. Figures now come from its 2025 annual report: 24,469 tonnes, up on 2024.. Sector corrected "SaaS / Digital Services" (base 70) → "E-commerce / Online Retail" (base 40), sourced from ANNUAL-REPORT E-commerce / Online Retail 96.4% of revenue (p.Printed p.57, note 3 Revenue (EUR '000). Share = 240,354/249,321 = 96.4% transaction revenue through the app (Surprise Bag fees plus Parcels sold gross); the report does not split Surprise Bags from Parcels. Management commentary describes 'the world's largest marketplace for surplus food'. JUDGEMENT CALL: this reads as an online food marketplace plus online retail of surplus groceries (Parcels), closer to E-commerce / Online Retail than to the record's current SaaS / Digital Services. The fee-for-app wording could also support SaaS / Digital Services, so this needs an owner ruling before any sector change.)
- Scored 534 April 2026
Initial score at platform launch
What evidence is Too Good To Go's score based on?
12 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which of the ten questions it informed.
25% of them were published by Too Good To Go itself; the rest come from independent sources.
9 of 12 sources are independent of the company.
“have not yet been implemented”
“Environmental footprint of the food saved by Too Good To Go”
“In its global Impact Report 2025, Too Good To Go reports that just under 157 million meals were saved via the app last year.”
“The new service – Too Good To Go Parcels – will purchase surplus items directly from brands.”
“Too Good To Go app is keeping even more food from being tossed”
“für ambitioniertere Ziele zur Reduzierung von Lebensmittelverschwendung”
“Too Good To Go expands in the US to combat food waste amid environmental challenges”
“Too Good To Go Holding ApS”
“Too Good To Go and CEVA Logistics have reached a major milestone, successfully distributing 100,000 surplus food parcels in just four months”
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Is this your company? Claim this profile (free)
Use this score in tenders
Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.
Open the score sheet →Send new evidence, free
Scored low because little is published? Publish what you do and send us the link, free. If it holds up, your score changes, and the change is logged on your page.
How to send evidence →Put your score on your website, free
It shows the current band, sector rank and score, and links to this page, so it changes when the score does.
Track this score
Bidding for a public contract? Check if you need a Carbon Reduction Plan, free →
Want your own page like this?
Free, independent, every source shown. Send it to any buyer who asks about your sustainability.
How does Too Good To Go compare with other e-commerce / online retail companies?
Where Too Good To Go sits among e-commerce / online retail peers.
Among the 26 major e-commerce / online retail brands we've scored, Too Good To Go is tied =18th of 26, with 1 other.
Who scores higher in E-commerce / Online Retail?
The 3 companies in the sector scoring nearest above Too Good To Go.
Back Market's business model delivers inherent circularity benefits—refurbished electronics avoid 91% of raw materials and 89% of e-waste versus new production.
See the breakdown →Zalando's total footprint rose 20% in 2025 to 2.5 MtCO2e, mostly from adding About You, which sits outside its targets.
See the breakdown →Bloom & Wild's emissions from growing its flowers were 21,725 tCO2e in its year to March 2025, about 90% of its supply-chain total, and they rose about 5% as it sold more.
See the breakdown →Which companies moved this week, and why.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
We'll send one email to confirm. No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Checking a company?
Search free →Asked to prove you're sustainable?
Get your business scored, free →Been scored?
Find your page and claim it, free →Scores are free. Nobody can pay to change a score, speed it up or hide it.