Robert Dyas sustainability score: 33/100
Making progress starts at 46. The highest score on SINK is 71.
Robert Dyas is a UK-based home and garden retail chain founded in 1872, operating 90+ stores and a distribution centre. It sells kitchenware, hardware, garden products, and home goods.
More about Robert Dyas
Mid-sized UK retailer with global supply chains typical of mass-market home goods retail.
Founded 1872Head office United Kingdom, United KingdomStaff ~1,300Revenue ~£107M (~$107M USD)Website ↗
Robert Dyas has no emissions data, no climate targets, and no sustainability governance. Energy efficiency work since 2022 shows operational cost-saving focus, not climate strategy. Supply chain emissions unmapped. No public sustainability disclosure.
Robert Dyas scores 33/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Scores are free. Nobody can pay to change a score, speed it up or hide it. Last verified May 2026.
That places Robert Dyas joint 629th of 1,023 companies scored, and joint 32nd of 54 in Retail (non-fashion).
What is Robert Dyas doing well, and where does it fall short?
Strongest on Controversies & Red Flags and Emissions Trajectory (7/10, 3/10). Weakest on Carbon Footprint: Supply Chain and Targets & Commitments (1/10, 1/10).
Where Robert Dyas lost points
For each question that lost points, the evidence our public rubric looks for that we didn't find.
What would raise this score
- Emissions from its supply chainAssess where its supply-chain emissions come from.
- Its climate targetsSet emissions reduction targets.
- Emissions from its own operationsPublish emissions figures for its own operations, even an estimate from energy bills.
Every question that lost points
- Emissions from its own operations2/10No emissions figures for its own operations, not even an estimate from energy bills.
- Emissions from its supply chain1/10No assessment of where its supply-chain emissions come from.
- Whether its emissions are falling3/10No evidence its emissions are falling, not even from energy bills or mileage.
- How clean its energy is3/10No renewable energy tariff or major efficiency investment shown.
- Its effect on nature2/10No assessment of its effect on nature, and no basic environmental policy.
- How it uses materials and handles waste3/10No active waste reduction, reuse or repair shown.
- Its effect on water3/10No monitoring of water use, or no measures to reduce it.
- Its climate targets1/10No emissions reduction targets.
- How openly it reports2/10No published sustainability data, or no one named as responsible for it.
- Its record on controversies7/10Points deducted for controversies or its business model. The finding is under question 10.
A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Anyone can send us new evidence, free. How to send it.
How is Robert Dyas's SINK score calculated?
Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleHas Robert Dyas's score changed?
Robert Dyas's score has been reviewed 3 times and currently stands where it started, at 33.
- 33 → 337 November 2026
Correction, 7 November 2026: removed an unsourced emissions figure. Score unchanged.
- 33 → 3325 April 2026
Session 2a cleanup: recomputed performance from sum(questions[].score). performance 26→27, score 33→33.
- Scored 339 April 2026
Initial score at platform launch
What evidence is Robert Dyas's score based on?
10 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which of the ten questions it informed.
60% of them were published by Robert Dyas itself; the rest come from independent sources.
Scored on 9 April 2026 under an earlier version of our method. We're re-checking it under the current method.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Is this your company? Claim this profile (free)
Use this score in tenders
Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.
Open the score sheet →Send new evidence, free
Scored low because little is published? Publish what you do and send us the link, free. If it holds up, your score changes, and the change is logged on your page.
How to send evidence →Put your score on your website, free
It shows the current band, sector rank and score, and links to this page, so it changes when the score does.
Track this score
Bidding for a public contract? Check if you need a Carbon Reduction Plan, free →
Want your own page like this?
Free, independent, every source shown. Send it to any buyer who asks about your sustainability.
How does Robert Dyas compare with other retail (non-fashion) companies?
Where Robert Dyas sits among retail (non-fashion) peers.
Among the 54 major retail (non-fashion) brands we've scored, Robert Dyas is tied =32nd of 54, with 4 others.
Who scores higher in Retail (non-fashion)?
The 3 companies in the sector scoring nearest above Robert Dyas.
Poundland operates with minimal emissions transparency and no supply chain carbon quantification despite acknowledging this is where most impacts occur.
See the breakdown →Aldi UK has validated science-based net-zero targets and reduced operational emissions 4.3% year-on-year, but absolute Scope 3 emissions rose 18% in 2023 due to business expansion.
See the breakdown →ALDI SOUTH has validated net-zero targets and eliminated 63% of operational emissions since 2016, but total Scope 3 emissions rose 18% in 2023 due to expansion.
See the breakdown →Which companies moved this week, and why.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
We'll send one email to confirm. No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Checking a company?
Search free →Asked to prove you're sustainable?
Get your business scored, free →Been scored?
Find your page and claim it, free →Scores are free. Nobody can pay to change a score, speed it up or hide it.