Rapanui Clothing sustainability score: 45/100
Better than 70% of Apparel (Durable / Outdoor)
Making progress starts at 46. The highest score on SINK is 71.
Rapanui is a UK-based sustainable apparel brand manufacturing durable clothing through a vertically integrated supply chain centred on organic cotton grown in India and production at facilities on the Isle of Wight and in India. The company operates a take-back circular model enabling garment remanufacture.
More about Rapanui Clothing
It is an SME within the broader outdoor and durable apparel sector.
Head office GBStaff ~51–200Revenue ~$5.7M–$12.9MWebsite ↗
Rapanui operates a genuinely circular apparel model with owned renewable energy and closed-loop manufacturing, but lacks formal emissions accounting and science-based targets. No Scope 1, 2, or 3 GHG inventory published. Unverified 'carbon neutral' claim undermines credibility despite strong operational practice.
Rapanui Clothing scores 45/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Scores are free. Nobody can pay to change a score, speed it up or hide it. Last verified May 2026.
That places Rapanui Clothing joint 281st of 1,023 companies scored, and joint 15th of 58 in Apparel (Durable / Outdoor).
What is Rapanui Clothing doing well, and where does it fall short?
Strongest on Resource Use & Waste and Controversies & Red Flags (8/10, 8/10). Weakest on Emissions Trajectory and Carbon Footprint: Operations (2/10, 3/10).
Where Rapanui Clothing lost points
For each question that lost points, the evidence our public rubric looks for that we didn't find.
What would raise this score
- Whether its emissions are fallingShow its emissions are falling, even from energy bills or mileage.
- Emissions from its own operationsPublish emissions figures for its own operations, even an estimate from energy bills.
- Its climate targetsSet specific targets with dates.
Every question that lost points
- Emissions from its own operations3/10No emissions figures for its own operations, not even an estimate from energy bills.
- Emissions from its supply chain4/10Most of its supply-chain (Scope 3) emissions aren't measured.
- Whether its emissions are falling2/10No evidence its emissions are falling, not even from energy bills or mileage.
- How clean its energy is7/10Less than 90% of its energy shown to be renewable.
- Its effect on nature5/10Its effect on nature isn't measured or independently verified.
- How it uses materials and handles waste8/10No closed-loop systems across its supply chain.
- Its effect on water6/10No water stewardship programme or verified fall in water use.
- Its climate targets3/10No specific targets with dates.
- How openly it reports5/10No dedicated sustainability role, board oversight or public report.
A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Anyone can send us new evidence, free. How to send it.
How is Rapanui Clothing's SINK score calculated?
Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleHas Rapanui Clothing's score changed?
Rapanui Clothing's score has been reviewed 2 times and currently stands where it started, at 45.
- 45 → 457 November 2026
Correction, 7 November 2026: removed an unsourced emissions figure. Score unchanged.
- Scored 455 April 2026
Initial score at platform launch
What evidence is Rapanui Clothing's score based on?
11 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which of the ten questions it informed.
9% of them were published by Rapanui Clothing itself; the rest come from independent sources.
“Teemill is proudly a carbon neutral and certified organic organisation”
“made from organic and recycled materials in our renewable energy-powered factory”
“entire supply chain of the company is monitored closely to ensure sustainability, traceability, and fairness”
“Teemill UK(the producer) owns a solar farm and power manufacturing operations with renewables. In India, the factory owns two wind farms and a 150kw PV array.”
“Solar and wind do the heavy lifting, not fossil fuels”
“Rapanui has also undertaken initiatives like the planting project to restore and regenerate biodiversity”
“cotton is grown using sustainable agricultural methods that help to promote biodiversity”
“In 2010, we developed the world's first traceability programme, with complete transparency across our supply chain”
“The SBTi's Target Dashboard lists companies and financial institutions that have set science-based targets, or have committed to developing targets.”
“Based on all publicly available information we've reviewed, we rate Rapanui 'Good' overall.”
“The founders of sustainable fashion brand Rapanui Clothing have declared war on greenwash.”
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Is this your company? Claim this profile (free)
Use this score in tenders
Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.
Open the score sheet →Send new evidence, free
Scored low because little is published? Publish what you do and send us the link, free. If it holds up, your score changes, and the change is logged on your page.
How to send evidence →Put your score on your website, free
It shows the current band, sector rank and score, and links to this page, so it changes when the score does.
Track this score
Bidding for a public contract? Check if you need a Carbon Reduction Plan, free →
Want your own page like this?
Free, independent, every source shown. Send it to any buyer who asks about your sustainability.
How does Rapanui Clothing compare with other apparel (durable / outdoor) companies?
Where Rapanui Clothing sits among apparel (durable / outdoor) peers.
Among the 58 major apparel (durable / outdoor) brands we've scored, Rapanui Clothing is tied =15th of 58, with 3 others.
Who scores higher in Apparel (Durable / Outdoor)?
The 3 companies in the sector scoring nearest above Rapanui Clothing.
A.P.C. has validated SBTi targets and Deloitte-verified carbon data, but Scope 3 (99% of footprint) lacks quantified reduction goals.
See the breakdown →Mulberry's footprint was 18,457 tCO2e in its year to March 2026, including the leather it buys, up 57% on the year as production rose and its calculation method changed.
See the breakdown →PANGAIA reports 1,460 tCO2e for 2025: Scope 1 of 0.0 t, market-based Scope 2 of 3.8 t and Scope 3 of 1,456.2 t, with no external assurance in the pages read.
See the breakdown →Which companies moved this week, and why.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
We'll send one email to confirm. No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Checking a company?
Search free →Asked to prove you're sustainable?
Get your business scored, free →Been scored?
Find your page and claim it, free →Scores are free. Nobody can pay to change a score, speed it up or hide it.