Decathlon sustainability score: 49/100
Leading practice starts at 60. The highest score on SINK is 71.
Decathlon is a French sports retailer that designs and sells its own brands of sports goods, headquartered in Villeneuve-d'Ascq; Decathlon SE is registered from 1977. It had about 102,900 employees and €16.8 billion net sales in 2025.
Founded 1977Head office Villeneuve-d'Ascq, FranceStaff ~102,900 (2025)Revenue ~€16.8B net sales (FY2025)Website ↗
Decathlon's total footprint has fallen for four years, to 7.95 MtCO2e in 2025, 16% below 2021, against SBTi-validated net-zero targets. Its electricity is about 89% renewable. In 2022 it paid €400,000 to settle a Dutch regulator's case over its 'Ecodesign' label, and in 2025 journalists linked leather in its supply chain to illegal deforestation in Brazil.
Decathlon scores 49/100 (Making progress) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Scores are free. Nobody can pay to change a score, speed it up or hide it. Last verified October 2026.
That places Decathlon joint 179th of 1,023 companies scored, and joint 6th of 54 in Retail (non-fashion).
What is Decathlon doing well, and where does it fall short?
Strongest on Targets & Commitments and Carbon Footprint: Operations (9/10, 8/10). Weakest on Nature & Biodiversity Impact and Water Impact (4/10, 4/10).
Where Decathlon lost points
For each question that lost points, the evidence our public rubric looks for that we didn't find.
What would raise this score
- Its effect on natureMeasure its effect on nature and have it independently verified.
- Its effect on waterMeasure its water footprint and set reduction targets.
- Its record on controversiesDeal with the findings under question 10, in public.
Every question that lost points
- Emissions from its own operations8/10No verified figures published with their method and a falling trend.
- Emissions from its supply chain8/10Its Scope 3 emissions aren't fully verified or falling year on year.
- Whether its emissions are falling7/10No consistent fall over several years across its operations and supply chain.
- How clean its energy is7/10Less than 90% of its energy shown to be renewable.
- Its effect on nature4/10Its effect on nature isn't measured or independently verified.
- How it uses materials and handles waste6/10No verified figures for reuse and recycling across the business.
- Its effect on water4/10No measured water footprint with reduction targets.
- Its climate targets9/10No validated long-term net zero target.
- How openly it reports7/10No annual impact report, or no pay linked to climate targets.
- Its record on controversies5/10Points deducted for controversies or its business model. The finding is under question 10.
A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Anyone can send us new evidence, free. How to send it.
How is Decathlon's SINK score calculated?
Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleWhat evidence is Decathlon's score based on?
15 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which of the ten questions it informed.
20% of them were published by Decathlon itself; the rest come from independent sources.
12 of 15 sources are independent of the company.
“- Scope 1 greenhouse gas emissions VERIFIED 31,452 32,481”
“with 89.4% of the electricity consumed coming from renewable sources”
“"siren_principal":306138900”
“The company's scope 1 and 2 emissions have been verified by a third party.”
“In 2025, 63% of DECATHLON’s total CO2 emissions were derived from the extraction of raw materials and the production stages”
“Decathlon has had its greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction targets validated by the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi)”
“In 2025, this commitment will be reinforced through the development of formal deforestation and comprehensive water strategies.”
“the group has cut carbon emissions by 16% since 2021”
“Decathlon’s top two footwear manufacturers source leather that may have come from illegally deforested areas in Brazil.”
“Some of this leather comes from farms in Brazil that have carried out illegal deforestation.”
“both stores have made commitments to adjust or no longer make sustainability claims on their products”
“H&M y Decathlon donarán 500.000 y 400.000 euros, respectivamente, a causas independientes y sostenibles para compensar sus afirmaciones sobre sostenibilidad, escribió la ACM.”
“will allow 14 of its major suppliers to source their power requirements from an new offshore solar farm”
“DECATHLON commits to reducing absolute scope 1, 2, and 3 GHG induced emissions by 42% by 2030 from our 2021 base year.”
“DECATHLON earned an A- on the 2025 Carbon Disclosure Project climate questionnaire.”
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Is this your company? Claim this profile (free)
Use this score in tenders
Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.
Open the score sheet →Send new evidence, free
Scored low because little is published? Publish what you do and send us the link, free. If it holds up, your score changes, and the change is logged on your page.
How to send evidence →Put your score on your website, free
It shows the current band, sector rank and score, and links to this page, so it changes when the score does.
Track this score
Bidding for a public contract? Check if you need a Carbon Reduction Plan, free →
Want your own page like this?
Free, independent, every source shown. Send it to any buyer who asks about your sustainability.
How does Decathlon compare with other retail (non-fashion) companies?
Where Decathlon sits among retail (non-fashion) peers.
Among the 54 major retail (non-fashion) brands we've scored, Decathlon is tied =6th of 54, with 1 other.
Who scores higher in Retail (non-fashion)?
The 3 companies in the sector scoring nearest above Decathlon.
WHSmith has delivered genuine operational emissions reductions—89% below 2020 baseline—backed by third-party verification and renewable electricity across its core estate.
See the breakdown →Grafton has validated science-based targets and cut its Scope 1 and 2 emissions 40.3% since 2021, but Scope 3 remains a year behind and product-use emissions rose 15.6% in 2024.
See the breakdown →Co-op has delivered measurable absolute emissions cuts across Scope 1+2 (59%) and met climate targets early, backed by SBTi validation.
See the breakdown →Which companies moved this week, and why.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
We'll send one email to confirm. No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Checking a company?
Search free →Asked to prove you're sustainable?
Get your business scored, free →Been scored?
Find your page and claim it, free →Scores are free. Nobody can pay to change a score, speed it up or hide it.