Cengage sustainability score: 24/100

Joint 20th of 29 in Media / Entertainment / Publishing on this question

No Scope 1 or Scope 2 data has been published by Cengage in any source from 2022 or later. No sustainability report, no CDP disclosure, no national registry filing (EPA FLIGHT, SECR) found. The most recent CSR content on cengagegroup.com dates to 2021 and covers only social and governance matters — no environmental metrics. Mark based on the company's size and sector. The rubric places a non-disclosing company of this size at score 2, and the company has no formal measurement.

Joint 23rd of 29 in Media / Entertainment / Publishing on this question

No Scope 3 data has been disclosed in any public source from 2022 or later. Cengage's supply chain includes paper sourcing, third-party printing and manufacturing of physical textbooks, global logistics, and digital infrastructure (servers, cloud services). While Cengage has been transitioning toward digital delivery — the Cengage Unlimited subscription platform is primarily digital — physical textbooks remain part of the portfolio, and the paper and printing supply chain carries meaningful upstream emissions. No supplier engagement programme, no Scope 3 assessment, and no category-level quantification found. Given the company's mid-sized revenue ($1.48B) and a supply chain that includes paper, printing, and cloud infrastructure, this represents a significant supply chain footprint without any public assessment.

Joint 20th of 29 in Media / Entertainment / Publishing on this question

No emissions trajectory data exists — no baseline year, no year-on-year comparison, no proxy data (energy bills, fuel records) published anywhere. Cengage is a mid-sized company with a significant physical textbook supply chain and growing digital operations (which bring their own server and data centre emissions). Without any data across any year, it is not possible to establish whether absolute emissions are rising or falling. The ongoing shift toward digital delivery could suggest falling print-related Scope 3, but this is not evidenced and digital infrastructure emissions may be offsetting gains. No trajectory data for a company of this revenue and footprint size scores 1.

Joint 21st of 29 in Media / Entertainment / Publishing on this question

No renewable energy data, no green energy tariff disclosure, no RE100 membership, and no power purchase agreements found for Cengage in any source from 2022 or later. Cengage's energy consumption comes from office buildings across multiple countries and digital infrastructure (servers). A 2023 blog post references an employee Green Team running monthly challenges including 'reducing energy costs,' but this is an informal employee resource group with no measurable energy strategy behind it. At this scale — primarily office-based, with contracted data centre and cloud usage — the physical energy footprint is moderate rather than negligible, but there is no formal energy strategy. Score 2: no formal renewable strategy, moderate energy consumer.

Joint 21st of 29 in Media / Entertainment / Publishing on this question

No biodiversity policy, no deforestation commitment, no TNFD disclosure, and no FSC or PEFC paper certification found for Cengage in any public source from 2022 or later. Cengage's primary nature exposure is through the paper and printing supply chain for physical textbooks — the publishing industry's most significant nature impact vector. Industry research confirms that paper manufacturing relies on wood pulp, with certified sustainable sourcing (FSC/PEFC) being the key mitigation. No evidence of such certification or any paper sourcing policy was found. Cengage scores 2: aware of the sector's nature risks (it publishes in environmental science) but no evidence of formal mitigation or assessment of its own supply chain.

Joint 21st of 29 in Media / Entertainment / Publishing on this question

No waste data, no circular economy targets, and no supplier sustainability requirements published by Cengage in any source from 2022 or later. The employee Green Team (referenced in a 2023 blog post) conducts informal awareness campaigns. The ongoing shift from print to digital delivery (Cengage Unlimited subscription, MindTap platform) reduces paper and physical waste from operations, but this is driven primarily by business model economics rather than an explicit circular economy strategy. No formal targets, no material stewardship programme, and no recycled paper policy found. Score 2: basic awareness-level activity via the Green Team, with some structural waste reduction from digital transition but no formalised programme.

Joint 20th of 29 in Media / Entertainment / Publishing on this question

No water consumption data, no water reduction targets, and no water policy found for Cengage in any public source from 2022 or later. Cengage's direct water use is limited to office facilities (drinking, sanitation, HVAC), making its operational water footprint modest. The indirect water impact through the paper and printing supply chain is more material — paper manufacturing is water-intensive — but no supply chain water assessment exists. Score 2: can be presumed to pay water bills at office facilities, no significant direct pollution risk, but no disclosed measurement or targets, and the supply chain water impact is unaddressed.

Joint 20th of 29 in Media / Entertainment / Publishing on this question

No emissions reduction targets, no net-zero commitment, no SBTi commitment or validation, and no climate-related targets of any kind found for Cengage in any public source from 2022 or later. The SBTi target dashboard does not list Cengage. CDP does not show a Cengage disclosure. The company's CSR content (last updated 2021) focuses entirely on social impact and education access — no environmental targets are referenced. The informal Green Team employee challenges do not constitute measurable commitments. Score 1: no formal targets of any kind.

Joint 20th of 29 in Media / Entertainment / Publishing on this question

No sustainability report published from 2022 or later. No dedicated sustainability role or team identified in public sources. No TCFD or CSRD disclosure. No board-level sustainability governance identified. The company's CSR webpage (last updated 2021) covers governance structure (7-member Board, 6 Executive Officers, Code of Conduct, Speak Up Line) and social impact but contains no environmental governance content. The only environmental governance evidence found is an employee resource group (Green Team) with an informal co-lead structure. No executive compensation linked to sustainability targets. Score 2: owner/leadership-adjacent sustainability interest via Green Team, no formal structure, no public environmental reporting.

Joint 2nd of 29 in Media / Entertainment / Publishing on this question

No environmental controversies, regulatory actions, greenwashing findings, or climate-related lawsuits found for Cengage in any source. InfluenceMap does not list Cengage in its corporate climate lobbying database — the company is not among the world's largest 400 industrial companies tracked for climate lobbying. No trade association memberships with climate-misaligned lobbying found. Cengage does not operate in a sector with structural fossil fuel exposure. The Green Team and education-focused mission present no structural climate risk at the corporate level. No deductions apply. Starting score of 8, no deductions. Score: 8.