Milady sustainability score: 25/100

Joint 20th of 29 in Media / Entertainment / Publishing on this question

No Scope 1 or Scope 2 emissions data has been published by Milady or its parent, Cengage Group. No sustainability report, CDP filing, or national GHG registry entry (Cengage is US-headquartered; no mandatory SECR or BEGES equivalent applies) was found. Mark based on the company's size and sector. Under SINK rules, a company of this size with no formal reporting scores 2. The absence of any public environmental data from Cengage Group as the parent confirms non-disclosure at entity level.

Joint 19th of 29 in Media / Entertainment / Publishing on this question

No Scope 3 data published. Milady's supply chain includes paper and printing (physical textbooks published under Cengage/Delmar imprint, e.g. Milady Standard Cosmetology 14th Edition available in print and digital format), digital platform hosting (CIMA), and distribution. The supply chain is moderately complex — printed textbooks involve paper sourcing and printing contractors — but Milady is primarily a content and platform business with growing digital delivery. No supplier engagement programme, no Scope 3 assessment, and no deforestation-free or FSC paper sourcing commitment was found. The shift toward digital (CIMA platform) reduces but does not eliminate the physical supply chain. Score 2 reflects: no formal data, but a supply chain of moderate rather than global-complex scale.

Joint 20th of 29 in Media / Entertainment / Publishing on this question

No multi-year emissions data exists for Milady or Cengage Group. No trajectory can be established. Milady's parent Cengage Group has been growing revenues (Adjusted Cash Revenue up 5% to $1.54 billion in Fiscal 2024, per Cengage Group's own results announcement), with continued acquisition activity, which combined with the absence of any emissions data and the lack of SBTi commitment, means there is no evidence that emissions are being reduced. A mid-sized company growing via acquisition with zero emissions disclosure scores 1 on trajectory: no data. The growing digital platform (CIMA) could represent improving efficiency, but this is an unverified inference and cannot be counted.

Joint 21st of 29 in Media / Entertainment / Publishing on this question

No renewable energy policy, green tariff, or energy sourcing data has been published by Milady or Cengage Group. No RE100 membership, no PPA, no on-site generation, and no evidence of any energy strategy was found. Milady operates primarily as a digital content and publishing division — relatively low energy intensity (office-based, cloud-hosted digital platform) — so the absence of a formal energy strategy is less damaging than for a high-energy manufacturer. Score 2 reflects: no formal renewable strategy, but the business has inherently low energy consumption by sector standards. A SaaS/digital content operation of this scale would typically have a negligible grid draw relative to a data centre or manufacturing plant.

Joint 14th of 29 in Media / Entertainment / Publishing on this question

No nature or biodiversity policy, TNFD disclosure, or deforestation-free commitment was found for Milady or Cengage Group. The key nature-relevant input for Milady is paper for physical textbooks (Milady Standard Cosmetology 14th Edition is available in print alongside digital formats). No FSC certification, SFI certification, or sustainable paper sourcing commitment was identified. However, Milady's growing shift toward digital delivery (CIMA platform, e-books) reduces paper demand over time, though this is a business decision rather than an explicit environmental policy. For a primarily office-based publisher with moderately declining print volumes and no agricultural, chemical, or extractive exposure, nature risk is genuine but not extreme. Score 3 reflects low-but-real paper/print supply chain exposure with no disclosed mitigation.

Joint 21st of 29 in Media / Entertainment / Publishing on this question

No waste reduction programme, circular economy targets, or resource management policy was identified for Milady or Cengage Group. The company produces large-format, full-colour cosmetology textbooks (e.g. Milady Standard Cosmetology 14th Edition, 1,129+ pages per volume), which represent significant paper and ink consumption. No evidence of recycled-content paper, waste minimisation targets, or take-back schemes was found. The shift to digital (CIMA) partially reduces material consumption, but physical textbooks remain a significant product line. Score 2 reflects basic awareness assumed by any operational business, but no demonstrated active waste strategy.

Joint 5th of 29 in Media / Entertainment / Publishing on this question

As a publishing and digital education company, Milady has genuinely low direct water impact. There are no manufacturing processes, no chemical discharge, and no significant freshwater withdrawal associated with core business operations (content creation, digital platform, office work). The paper supply chain carries indirect water risk (pulp/paper manufacturing is water-intensive), but Milady itself does not control this process and it is not a primary production company. No water data, monitoring, or stewardship programme was found — but for a company of this type, the absence of high water impact is credible. Score 4 reflects genuinely low water exposure with basic office-level water use, consistent with the rubric guidance for service companies with minimal material footprint.

Joint 23rd of 29 in Media / Entertainment / Publishing on this question

No emissions reduction targets, net-zero commitment, SBTi registration, or sustainability goals of any kind were found for Milady or its parent Cengage Group. No CDP questionnaire response exists. No informal goals, pledges, or offset programme was identified. The 'Our Impact' page on milady.com addresses social and educational impact only, with no reference to environmental targets. This is a complete absence of any environmental commitment. Score 0 is warranted.

Joint 23rd of 29 in Media / Entertainment / Publishing on this question

No sustainability reporting, environmental governance structure, dedicated sustainability role, TCFD disclosure, or board-level sustainability oversight was identified for Milady or Cengage Group. The milady.com website contains no environmental disclosures. The 'Our Impact' section references educational and social impact only. No annual sustainability or ESG report was found on Cengage Group's corporate site or via third-party registries (CSRHub lists Cengage Learning but provides no substantive environmental data). There is no evidence of any formal sustainability governance. Score 1 reflects the total absence of environmental transparency in a company that is large enough (as part of a $1.5B revenue group) that some basic disclosure would be expected.

Joint 2nd of 29 in Media / Entertainment / Publishing on this question

No environmental controversies, greenwashing allegations, regulatory fines, climate-related lawsuits, or lobbying activity against climate policy was found for Milady or Cengage Group. InfluenceMap/LobbyMap does not appear to track Cengage Group. No specialist NGO reports (DeSmog, Stand.earth, etc.) reference the company. Milady is a beauty education publisher with no fossil-fuel client exposure, no structural enablement of high-emission sectors, and no trade association memberships with climate-misaligned positions were identified. Starting at 8 with no deductions applicable. Score 8.