Gale, part of Cengage sustainability score: 22/100

Joint 25th of 29 in Media / Entertainment / Publishing on this question

No Scope 1 or Scope 2 emissions data has been published by Cengage Group or Gale for any year from 2022 onwards. No sustainability or ESG report was found post-2021. No CDP disclosure found. No EPA GHGRP filing applies (below the 25,000 tonne threshold for mandatory US reporting). Cengage Group has approximately 3,800 employees across primarily office-based operations with some data centre and printing infrastructure. Mark based on the company's size and sector. Under the rubric, a mid-sized company with no data scores 1.

Joint 23rd of 29 in Media / Entertainment / Publishing on this question

No Scope 3 data has been published. Gale's supply chain includes digital infrastructure (cloud/data hosting, software vendors), residual print and paper production, logistics for physical products, and business travel. Gale has shifted heavily toward digital databases and e-books, but still distributes some print reference titles through Thorndike Press and other imprints. The print supply chain carries meaningful upstream paper and printing emissions. No supplier engagement programme, no Scope 3 category assessment, and no third-party supply chain mapping was found in any public source. As a mid-sized company with a complex mixed digital-and-print supply chain and no data at all, a score of 1 applies.

Joint 20th of 29 in Media / Entertainment / Publishing on this question

No emissions data exists for any year from 2022 onwards, making year-on-year trajectory analysis impossible. Cengage Group has grown revenue over multiple consecutive years (mid-single-digit growth reported for FY2024) and has expanded via acquisitions (InfoSec Institute 2022, Visible Body 2025). Without a baseline, no trajectory can be assessed. The company is mid-sized and growing, which in the absence of evidence of emissions management makes a stable or declining trajectory unlikely. Score of 1 applies: no trajectory data, mid-sized company with significant footprint and evidence of business growth.

Joint 27th of 29 in Media / Entertainment / Publishing on this question

No renewable energy strategy, RE100 membership, power purchase agreement, or green tariff data has been found for Cengage Group or Gale. No percentage of renewable energy is published. Gale operates offices, data infrastructure for hosting large digital databases, and some print operations — making it a moderate energy consumer. Without any published evidence of a renewable energy programme, a score of 1 applies for a moderate energy consumer with no documented renewable strategy.

Joint 21st of 29 in Media / Entertainment / Publishing on this question

No TNFD disclosure, no deforestation commitment, and no FSC paper sourcing policy has been found in any public source. Gale's primary nature exposure is through paper and print: residual print titles are produced via printing and paper supply chains that carry deforestation and land-use risk. However, Gale has migrated substantially toward digital-first delivery. No nature-related assessments or policies are documented. A score of 2 reflects awareness of key nature risks implicit in the publishing sector, without evidence of any formal mitigation or policy — this is not a score for performance, but for the absence of documented worst practices in a company that has de-emphasised print.

Joint 21st of 29 in Media / Entertainment / Publishing on this question

No waste data, circularity targets, or materials management policy has been found for Cengage or Gale. The company produces physical reference books and large-print titles through Thorndike Press and other imprints, with associated packaging, returns, and pulping of unsold inventory — a known source of waste in publishing. No supplier sustainability requirements related to materials are documented. A score of 2 reflects basic awareness and the sector context (digital migration reduces material intensity), but no evidence of active waste minimisation beyond the passive effect of moving toward digital products.

Joint 12th of 29 in Media / Entertainment / Publishing on this question

No water consumption data or water management policy has been found for Cengage or Gale. As a predominantly digital services and publishing company operating primarily in office environments, Gale's direct water footprint is inherently low — it does not operate water-intensive manufacturing, agriculture, or chemical processes. Indirect water use through data centre cooling and paper supply chain is present but not material at the company's scale relative to water-intensive sectors. A score of 3 reflects an inherently low-water-impact business model where absence of formal data is less concerning, but no active water stewardship programme has been evidenced.

Joint 23rd of 29 in Media / Entertainment / Publishing on this question

No environmental targets of any kind have been found for Cengage Group or Gale. No SBTi commitment or validated target exists on the SBTi Target Dashboard. No CDP response with target data was found. No net-zero commitment, carbon neutrality pledge, or interim emissions reduction target is published on the company's website or in any third-party database. The CSR pages on cengagegroup.com (dated 2021) address governance and social impact only. No evidence of offsets, reduction roadmap, or any formal environmental commitment was located. Score of 0: no targets and no disclosed reduction strategy.

Joint 23rd of 29 in Media / Entertainment / Publishing on this question

No sustainability report has been published by Cengage Group or Gale post-2021. The 2021 CSR pages on cengagegroup.com cover governance structure and social impact, with no environmental data, emissions disclosures, or environmental governance. No TCFD, CSRD, or GRI report is available. No dedicated sustainability role is publicly evidenced. No board-level sustainability oversight or executive compensation linked to environmental targets was found. S&P Global CSA lists Cengage Learning Holdings II Inc under Diversified Consumer Services but no public ESG score is accessible. As a private company with $1.5B revenue and 3,800 employees, the absence of any environmental sustainability reporting represents a material gap in accountability. Score of 1 reflects no public environmental information and no evident sustainability governance structure.

Joint 2nd of 29 in Media / Entertainment / Publishing on this question

No environmental controversies, greenwashing complaints, regulatory fines, or climate-related lawsuits were found for Cengage Group or Gale. No InfluenceMap profile or lobbying record was found. No fossil-sector client exposure or structural fossil-economy enablement applies — Gale is an educational database and publishing company with no material connection to fossil fuel commerce. No trade association memberships with misaligned climate positions were identified. Starting score of 8 with no deductions: clean environmental controversy record with no lobbying activity and no structural enablement issues.