SaaS / Digital Services

Oracle sustainability score: 36/100

36/100
Below expectations-11 since last review
Joint 36th of 69 in SaaS / Digital Services

Better than 46% of SaaS / Digital Services

Making progress starts at 46. The highest score on SINK is 71.

Is this your company? Claim this profile (free)

About Oracle

Oracle sells cloud services, software, hardware and related services, and its cloud and software business brought in most of its revenue in its year to May 2026. Oracle Corporation was incorporated in 2005 as a Delaware corporation; its roots go back to 1977.

More about Oracle

It had about 141,000 full-time employees at the end of May 2026 and US$67.4B revenue for the year.

Founded 2005Head office Austin, United StatesStaff ~141,000 full-time (31 May 2026)Revenue ~US$67.4B (year to 31 May 2026)Website ↗

Read Oracle's own report ↗

Our verdict

Oracle's market-based footprint was 14,265,951 t in FY26, up from 9,071,423 t in FY25, with capital goods at 10,888,391 t. It claims 100% renewable electricity on annual matching, through PPAs, onsite generation and renewable energy credits, with no published split or contracted volume; market-based Scope 2 fell 98% while location-based rose 68%. Its target of a 50% cut by 2030 is self-set, with no SBTi validation found. It withheld FY26 e-waste figures pending a method review. The Center for Biological Diversity and New Energy Economy challenge its Project Jupiter campus; the court hold and permits are unresolved, with no upheld finding.

Oracle scores 36/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Scores are free. Nobody can pay to change a score, speed it up or hide it. Last verified November 2026.

That places Oracle joint 542nd of 1,023 companies scored, and joint 36th of 69 in SaaS / Digital Services.

The ten questions

What is Oracle doing well, and where does it fall short?

Strongest on Carbon Footprint: Operations and Carbon Footprint: Supply Chain (8/10, 7/10). Weakest on Emissions Trajectory and Energy Source (0/10, 2/10).

What's missing

Where Oracle lost points

For each question that lost points, the evidence our public rubric looks for that we didn't find.

What would raise this score

  • Whether its emissions are fallingShow its emissions are falling.
  • How clean its energy isMove to a renewable energy tariff or make a major efficiency investment.
  • Its effect on natureAssess its effect on nature and publish a basic environmental policy.

Every question that lost points

  • Emissions from its own operations8/10No verified figures published with their method and a falling trend.
  • Emissions from its supply chain7/10No full value-chain map or supplier engagement programme.
  • Whether its emissions are falling0/10No evidence its emissions are falling.
  • How clean its energy is2/10No renewable energy tariff or major efficiency investment shown.
  • Its effect on nature2/10No assessment of its effect on nature, and no basic environmental policy.
  • How it uses materials and handles waste5/10No measurable waste or recycling targets reported publicly.
  • Its effect on water4/10No measured water footprint with reduction targets.
  • Its climate targets4/10Its targets aren't science-based or committed to the Science Based Targets initiative.
  • How openly it reports6/10No annual impact report, or no pay linked to climate targets.
  • Its record on controversies6/10Points deducted for controversies or its business model. The finding is under question 10.

A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Anyone can send us new evidence, free. How to send it.

The calculation

How is Oracle's SINK score calculated?

Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.

SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × Scale
Industry base impact
SaaS / Digital Services sector ceiling.
70 / 100
Performance score
Sum of the ten questions, each scored 0 to 10.
44 / 100
Raw score
Weighted average before scale penalty.
(0.3 × 70) + (0.7 × 44) = 51.8
Scale penalty
Multiplier based on total emissions. Bigger polluters lose more.
× 0.7
Final score
Rounded. Below expectations.
36 / 100
How this score has moved

Has Oracle's score changed?

Oracle's score has moved from 47 to 36 across 2 recorded reviews, down 11 points.

0255075100474 April 2026367 November 2026
  1. 47 → 36-117 November 2026

    AI supply chain batch: re-scored from pre-v2.5 under v2.5 and owner rulings 2026-11-06/07 (unbundled certificates earn no Q4 credit; categories 1 and 2 material for chipmakers and data centres)

  2. Scored 474 April 2026

    Initial score at platform launch

Where the evidence comes from

What evidence is Oracle's score based on?

12 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which of the ten questions it informed.

42% of them were published by Oracle itself; the rest come from independent sources.

Scope 2, FY2026: market-based 4,299 t, location-based 2,690,440 t. The score uses market-based.

7 of 12 sources are independent of the company.

[1]Self-reported
Oracle FY26 Environmental and Social Impact Datasheet

“Scope 1 greenhouse gas emissions [metric tons CO2e] 15,272 29,930 27,532 26,265”

2026
Q1Q2Q3Q4Q6Q7Q8Q9
View →
[2]Self-reported
Oracle UK Carbon Reduction Plan 2025

“limited assurance is performed at a global level in accordance with ISO14064-3”

2025
Q1
View →
[3]Self-reported
Oracle Social Impact — Sustainability Operations

“100% of our key tier 1 and tier 2 suppliers have emission reduction targets in place as of FY25”

Ongoing
Q2Q3Q4Q5Q7Q9
View →
[4]SEC filing
Oracle FY2026 Form 10-K

“increased from $21.2 billion in fiscal 2025 to $55.7 billion in fiscal 2026 primarily due to the expansion of our data centers”

2026
Q3Q9
View →
[5]Self-reported
Oracle Technical Carbon Calculation Guidance

“externally assured by a third party using the ISO14064-3”

2026
Q9
View →
[6]Independent source
KUNC: Oracle Revises Plans for Massive Project Jupiter Data Center

“proposed 1,400‑acre, $165-billion campus”

2026
Q5Q7Q10
View →
[7]Independent source
Energy Connects: Oracle Data Center Fight Hands Activists Path to US-Wide Blitz

“Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) — another nonprofit fighting Oracle”

2026
Q5Q7Q10
View →
[8]Independent source
WIRED: New Gas-Powered Data Centers Could Emit More Greenhouse Gases Than Entire Nations

“have a combined potential to emit more than 24 million tons of greenhouse gases each year”

2026
Q10
View →
[9]Independent source
BGov: Oracle Data Centers Pipeline Plan Rerouted After Rejections

“which has twice rejected the pipeline’s right-of-way application”

2026
Q10
View →
[10]Independent source
As You Sow: Oracle Shareholder Vote to Protect Employees' Life Savings from Climate Risk

“directs over $1 billion of employees retirement savings into fossil fuel producers”

2024
Q10
View →
[11]Self-reported
Oracle Customers: Kuwait Gulf Oil Company

“Arabian Gulf oil producer unifies financials, human resources, and supply chain management using Oracle Cloud ERP, HCM, and SCM.”

Unknown
Q10
View →
[12]Independent source
Latitude Media: Oracle and OpenAI Bet That More Solar Could Combat Data Center Pushback

“a microgrid fully powered by 2.45 gigawatts of Bloom Energy fuel cells, which also run on fossil gas”

2026
Q4
View →

If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.

For Oracle

Is this your company? Claim this profile (free)

Free. Once you confirm, this page says “Profile claimed by Oracle” and we email you when the score changes. Claiming changes nothing about the score. More than one person can claim a company. Privacy

  • Use this score in tenders

    Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.

    Open the score sheet →
  • Send new evidence, free

    Scored low because little is published? Publish what you do and send us the link, free. If it holds up, your score changes, and the change is logged on your page.

    How to send evidence →
  • Put your score on your website, free

    It shows the current band, sector rank and score, and links to this page, so it changes when the score does.

    Oracle: SINK sustainability score 36.

Track this score

We'll send one email to confirm. Every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy

Bidding for a public contract? Check if you need a Carbon Reduction Plan, free →

We reply within 5 working days.

Want your own page like this?

Free, independent, every source shown. Send it to any buyer who asks about your sustainability.

Score my business free
Oracle in context

How does Oracle compare with other saas / digital services companies?

Where Oracle sits among saas / digital services peers.

Among the 69 major saas / digital services brands we've scored, Oracle is tied =36th of 69, with 2 others.

=36/69
Oracle's rank
39
Industry average
21
Industry low
71
Industry high
See all 69 in SaaS / Digital Services →
Explore next

Who scores higher in SaaS / Digital Services?

The 3 companies in the sector scoring nearest above Oracle.

See the full SaaS / Digital Services table →
THE SUNDAY RUNDOWN

Which companies moved this week, and why.

One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.

We'll send one email to confirm. No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

Checking a company?

Search free →

Asked to prove you're sustainable?

Get your business scored, free →

Been scored?

Find your page and claim it, free →

Scores are free. Nobody can pay to change a score, speed it up or hide it.