Humble Bundle sustainability score: 37/100

Joint 34th of 69 in SaaS / Digital Services on this question

Humble Bundle publishes no standalone emissions data. Its parent, Ziff Davis, conducts an annual GHG inventory with independent third-party expert verification and has done so since 2021, covering Scope 1, 2, and 3 at the consolidated group level — but no Humble Bundle-specific breakdown is publicly available. Mark based on what it discloses and the company's size and sector. The SEC DEF 14A (FY2024, filed 2025) confirms Ziff Davis uses an independent third-party expert for GHG measurement. Per the Q1 rubric, an entity of this size with no formal entity-level report scores 3.

Joint 30th of 69 in SaaS / Digital Services on this question

Humble Bundle's supply chain consists primarily of software licensing agreements with game developers, cloud hosting, and payment processing — an inherently short, low-material, digital supply chain with no physical goods manufacturing or shipping. No Humble Bundle-specific Scope 3 data is published. At the Ziff Davis parent level, Scope 3 is measured and includes purchased goods and services as the primary category; the 2025 DEF 14A identifies 'upstream emissions associated with our suppliers' as a key source and notes active supply chain engagement to encourage measurement. Per the Q2 rubric, an inherently simple, low-impact digital supply chain with basic awareness of key emission sources scores 3 even without formal Scope 3 data, because the physics are clear: a digital storefront's supply chain is categorically lower impact than a physical goods company's.

Joint 15th of 69 in SaaS / Digital Services on this question

No Humble Bundle-specific multi-year emissions trajectory exists. At the Ziff Davis parent level, Scope 3 declined 38% from 2022 to 2023, and operational office square footage was reduced by 26% in 2023, indicating a declining physical footprint trend. The FY2025 DEF 14A confirms the company continues to shrink operational square footage year over year and is migrating workloads to cloud providers committed to zero carbon. Mark based on the company's size and sector, its remote-work model and digital delivery. Per the Q3 rubric, a small, stable company with a reasonable inference of stable or declining emissions scores 3. No evidence of emissions growth.

Joint 27th of 69 in SaaS / Digital Services on this question

Humble Bundle delivers entirely digital products — no physical manufacturing, warehousing, or shipping. Its energy consumption is limited to office electricity (San Francisco HQ plus remote employees) and its share of cloud infrastructure. Ziff Davis has disclosed it is 'moving the majority of our development and production environments from co-located data centers to cloud platform providers committed to zero carbon footprints' (DEF 14A FY2025). No specific renewable energy percentage is published for Humble Bundle alone, and no PPA or RE100 membership is identified. Per the Q4 rubric, a minimal energy consumer whose parent is actively transitioning to zero-carbon cloud infrastructure scores 4. Lack of a formal renewable energy strategy or published percentage prevents a higher score.

Joint 7th of 69 in SaaS / Digital Services on this question

Humble Bundle operates exclusively in digital goods — no land use, no deforestation risk, no physical supply chain with ecosystem exposure. Its inherent nature impact is negligible. In 2023, Humble raised over $1 million for environmental causes including One Tree Planted (reforestation), Coral Guardian (marine ecosystem protection), and Cool Effect (carbon removal), as disclosed in the Humble 2023 Social Impact Report. No formal TNFD disclosure or biodiversity policy exists. Per the Q5 rubric, a company with genuinely negligible nature impact and demonstrated environmental awareness (including direct funding of ecosystem restoration work) scores 5. The charitable contributions are real but do not constitute a formal nature programme or verified net positive outcome.

Joint 8th of 69 in SaaS / Digital Services on this question

Humble Bundle's digital-only model eliminates physical packaging, physical goods manufacturing, and shipping-related waste — the most material resource consumption categories for a typical retailer. All products (games, e-books, software) are delivered digitally. No office waste reporting, e-waste policy, or circular procurement policy is publicly available for Humble Bundle specifically. The digital distribution model is inherently circular for content — no physical returns, no packaging waste. The absence of a formal waste policy is offset by the structural impossibility of most resource and waste categories applying to a digital platform. Per the Q6 rubric, a service company with minimal material footprint and a business model that eliminates most physical waste by design scores 5.

Joint 5th of 69 in SaaS / Digital Services on this question

Humble Bundle is a digital services company with no manufacturing, no agricultural processes, and no industrial water use. Its water consumption is limited to sanitary use at its San Francisco office — a de minimis amount for a company of approximately 150 people. No water data or water stewardship reporting is published by Humble Bundle. Per the Q7 rubric, companies with genuinely low water impact and awareness of that fact (the digital model structurally precludes major water use) score 4–6. No evidence of water pollution incidents or watershed risk. Score of 5 reflects negligible impact with no formal monitoring programme.

Joint 11th of 69 in SaaS / Digital Services on this question

Humble Bundle publishes no standalone emissions reduction targets. Its parent Ziff Davis has SBTi-validated targets: an absolute 50% reduction in Scope 1 and 2 GHG by 2030 from a 2021 base year (absolute — stronger), and a 51.6% reduction in Scope 3 from purchased goods and services and capital goods per USD value added by 2030 (intensity-based — weaker). The SBTi validation is confirmed by Ziff Davis DEF 14A (FY2023 and FY2024), Nasdaq press releases, and Smart Energy Decisions reporting. Per the Q8 rubric, SBTi-committed targets score 6; however, the Scope 3 target is intensity-based rather than absolute, which prevents a 6. No evidence of heavy offset reliance or net-zero claims without credible pathway. Humble Bundle itself has no formal environmental targets.

Joint 22nd of 69 in SaaS / Digital Services on this question

Humble Bundle publishes an annual Social Impact Report (the 2023 edition was released February 2024 and publicly disclosed key charitable metrics including climate spend). It has a dedicated VP of Social Impact (Kamini Tiwari) with a public profile. Its parent Ziff Davis publishes annual ESG and DEI reports, participates in CDP, and files detailed governance disclosures in SEC proxy statements (DEF 14A). However, Humble Bundle itself does not publish a standalone environmental report, does not have board-level sustainability governance publicly disclosed, and does not link executive compensation to sustainability targets at the Humble level. The Social Impact Report covers charitable giving but not operational environmental performance. Per the Q9 rubric, this profile scores 5: sustainability is a documented business priority with assigned responsibility (VP Social Impact), key charitable data is publicly available, but formal operational environmental governance and public emissions disclosure at the entity level are absent.

Joint 3rd of 69 in SaaS / Digital Services on this question

Starting at 8. No environmental controversies, regulatory fines, greenwashing allegations, or environmental damage found for Humble Bundle across all searches including InfluenceMap, journalism, and NGO databases. The only controversies found relate to game selection quality in its subscription service (consumer complaints about game choices), which are entirely unrelated to environmental performance. Humble Bundle is not structurally exposed to the fossil economy: it is a digital games/software marketplace with no payment network dominance, no fossil-sector advertising revenue, and no financial infrastructure role. No lobbying activity against climate policy found. Humble Bundle's charitable model (donating a portion of every sale to causes including environmental charities) is a positive factor but does not add points under this question — it is captured in Q5/Q9. No deductions apply. Score remains 8.