Entain sustainability score: 37/100
Better than 50% of SaaS / Digital Services
Making progress starts at 46. The highest score on SINK is 71.
Entain is a London-listed online gambling and sports betting company operating digital betting platforms, retail betting shops, and related services across multiple geographies. Founded 2004, it is a major UK-listed operator in the regulated online gaming sector with substantial global reach.
Founded 2004Head office GBStaff ~29,000Revenue ~£5.3bn NGRWebsite ↗
Entain has rebaselined climate targets, retired Scope 3 goals, and shown rising absolute emissions. A £615m bribery settlement in 2023 signals governance failure. Renewable energy procurement is solid; accountability structures exist. Core weaknesses: greenwashed trajectory, unvalidated SBTi targets, absent circularity strategy.
Entain scores 37/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Scores are free. Nobody can pay to change a score, speed it up or hide it. Last verified August 2026.
That places Entain joint 507th of 1,023 companies scored, and joint 32nd of 69 in SaaS / Digital Services.
What is Entain doing well, and where does it fall short?
Strongest on Transparency & Accountability and Carbon Footprint: Operations (7/10, 6/10). Weakest on Emissions Trajectory and Resource Use & Waste (2/10, 3/10).
Where Entain lost points
For each question that lost points, the evidence our public rubric looks for that we didn't find.
What would raise this score
- Whether its emissions are fallingShow its emissions are falling.
- How it uses materials and handles wasteShow active waste reduction, reuse or repair.
- Its climate targetsSet specific targets with dates.
Every question that lost points
- Emissions from its own operations6/10Its own emissions aren't independently verified or tracked over several years.
- Emissions from its supply chain5/10Most of its supply-chain (Scope 3) emissions aren't measured.
- Whether its emissions are falling2/10No evidence its emissions are falling.
- How clean its energy is6/10Less than 90% of its energy shown to be renewable.
- Its effect on nature4/10Its effect on nature isn't measured or independently verified.
- How it uses materials and handles waste3/10No active waste reduction, reuse or repair shown.
- Its effect on water4/10No measured water footprint with reduction targets.
- Its climate targets3/10No specific targets with dates.
- How openly it reports7/10No annual impact report, or no pay linked to climate targets.
- Its record on controversies5/10Points deducted for controversies or its business model. The finding is under question 10.
A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Anyone can send us new evidence, free. How to send it.
How is Entain's SINK score calculated?
Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleHas Entain's score changed?
Entain's score has been reviewed 2 times and currently stands where it started, at 37.
- 37 → 377 November 2026
Correction, 7 November 2026: removed an unsourced emissions figure. Score unchanged.
- Scored 3729 August 2026
Initial public score 37 (publish-draft)
What evidence is Entain's score based on?
12 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which of the ten questions it informed.
58% of them were published by Entain itself; the rest come from independent sources.
“Coverage of energy consumption and emissions data is 100% for the UK, with some data gaps in our global operations”
“Embedded the EcoVadis platform into our tender process, now assessing 46% of our in-scope supplier base (up from 35% in 2023).”
“achieving 76% of global electricity from renewable sources”
“just under 100 per cent of its electricity in the UK and Republic of Ireland from renewable sources”
“In 2018, Entain set a target to reduce Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 15 percent per colleague by the end of 2021”
“Task Force for Climate-related Financial Disclosures ("TCFD") Statement 2023”
“Developed near-term science-based greenhouse gas reduction target, for verification by the Science-Based Targets initiative”
“Entain has entered into a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) with the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) for £615 million”
“Entain, the parent company of Ladbrokes and Coral, settled bribery charges linked to its Turkish subsidiary.”
“The SBTi's Target Dashboard lists companies and financial institutions that have set science-based targets, or have committed to developing targets.”
“we will also continue to meet our legal obligations and other requirements in the countries where we operate”
“refresh of our double materiality assessment in 2025, which brought together subject matter expertise from across the Group”
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Is this your company? Claim this profile (free)
Use this score in tenders
Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.
Open the score sheet →Send new evidence, free
Scored low because little is published? Publish what you do and send us the link, free. If it holds up, your score changes, and the change is logged on your page.
How to send evidence →Put your score on your website, free
It shows the current band, sector rank and score, and links to this page, so it changes when the score does.
Track this score
Bidding for a public contract? Check if you need a Carbon Reduction Plan, free →
Want your own page like this?
Free, independent, every source shown. Send it to any buyer who asks about your sustainability.
How does Entain compare with other saas / digital services companies?
Where Entain sits among saas / digital services peers.
Among the 69 major saas / digital services brands we've scored, Entain is tied =32nd of 69, with 3 others.
Who scores higher in SaaS / Digital Services?
The 3 companies in the sector scoring nearest above Entain.
Microsoft's emissions rose 25% in FY2025 to 21.1 Mt CO2e, driven by data-centre construction: capital-goods emissions rose from 5.6 Mt to 9.0 Mt and Scope 3 is 86% of the total.
See the breakdown →Slack has no independent sustainability reporting; all environmental data is buried in parent Salesforce's consolidated metrics.
See the breakdown →Wren is a carbon offset platform operating in a structurally contested market.
See the breakdown →Which companies moved this week, and why.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
We'll send one email to confirm. No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Checking a company?
Search free →Asked to prove you're sustainable?
Get your business scored, free →Been scored?
Find your page and claim it, free →Scores are free. Nobody can pay to change a score, speed it up or hide it.