Miss Humblebee's Academy sustainability score: 29/100

Joint 34th of 69 in SaaS / Digital Services on this question

No formal emissions data published. Miss Humblebee's Academy is a very small company (1–25 employees per ZoomInfo/RocketReach aggregator data, revenue under $5M) operating a fully browser-based digital platform with no physical manufacturing or heavy energy infrastructure. The company is headquartered in Boca Raton, FL, and operates as a distributed/remote-first organisation. Mark based on the company's size and sector. No BEGES, SECR, CDP, or any other mandatory/voluntary registry disclosure was found. At this scale, absence of a formal report is less environmentally significant than it would be for a larger organisation: the planet barely notices operations of this size. Score reflects the negligible physical scale rather than penalising heavily for non-disclosure.

Joint 45th of 69 in SaaS / Digital Services on this question

No supply chain emissions data published. The company's supply chain is inherently simple for a digital SaaS business: no physical goods manufacturing, no logistics network, no raw material extraction. Key upstream inputs are cloud/hosting infrastructure (Shopify on Google Cloud, which matches energy with renewables per SEC filing evidence) and software development. Downstream: digital delivery to end users via browsers. No formal Scope 3 calculation, no supplier engagement programme, and no CDP disclosure found. The inherently short, digital supply chain limits physical impact, but the company has not mapped or acknowledged this. Score reflects simple supply chain with negligible physical impact rather than penalising as if this were a complex global goods manufacturer.

Joint 30th of 69 in SaaS / Digital Services on this question

No trajectory data of any kind published. The company has not reported emissions in any year, so year-on-year comparison is not possible. The company is small, digital, and remote-first with no known physical expansion into high-emissions infrastructure. It has grown its user base (from curriculum to 3,000+ lessons, 500,000 families in 81 countries per April 2026 press release) but growth in a browser-based SaaS business does not proportionally increase absolute emissions in the way physical expansion would. Mark based on the company's size and sector. Score of 2 reflects a small, stable digital business with no evidence of emissions growth, rather than 0 which would apply to a large growing heavy-industry company with no data.

Joint 36th of 69 in SaaS / Digital Services on this question

No formal energy strategy published by Miss Humblebee's Academy. The company's primary digital infrastructure runs on Shopify, which in turn runs on Google Cloud — Google matches its electricity consumption with renewable energy (confirmed in Shopify's SEC Form 6-K filing). However, this is Shopify's/Google's commitment, not Miss Humblebee's own. The company has not itself adopted a green energy tariff, renewable energy certificate, or published any energy policy. As a very small, distributed company with minimal energy use (primarily employees' home devices and broadband), the physical energy footprint is negligible. Score of 3 reflects a minimal-energy-consumption business with indirect renewable hosting benefit, but no independent energy commitment of its own.

Joint 37th of 69 in SaaS / Digital Services on this question

No biodiversity policy, TNFD disclosure, or nature impact assessment found. Miss Humblebee's Academy is a pure digital SaaS business with no physical manufacturing, no land use, no deforestation risk in its supply chain, and no significant nature-impacting procurement. Its primary physical inputs are electronics used by employees and end users — a modest embedded materials footprint. No evidence of formal nature risk assessment, but the inherent nature exposure of a digital educational platform is genuinely low. No print physical goods are sold. The printables offered are downloaded by users and printed on end-user devices. Score reflects genuinely low nature exposure with no evidence of active nature risk management beyond the passive benefit of digital-first operations.

Joint 31st of 69 in SaaS / Digital Services on this question

No waste or resource management data published. As a purely digital business, material resource consumption is limited to employee electronics and office consumables. No physical product is manufactured or shipped. Printable materials are delivered digitally and printed by end users, shifting material use to households. There is no evidence of a circular economy programme, e-waste policy, or supplier sustainability requirements. However, the business model is inherently low-material by design: browser-based lessons, digital ebooks, and downloadable content avoid packaging, shipping, and physical product lifecycle impacts. Score reflects genuinely low material footprint without any formal resource management programme.

Joint 17th of 69 in SaaS / Digital Services on this question

No water consumption data published. Miss Humblebee's Academy is a digital-only SaaS business. It operates no manufacturing, no agriculture, no data centres of its own, and no physical facilities beyond any small office or home-based workspaces. Water consumption is negligible — limited to standard sanitary use by a handful of employees. No chemical discharge risk. No water stewardship programme is needed or evidenced. Score of 4 reflects genuinely negligible water impact appropriate to the business model, not a reward for formal disclosure: the physical reality is that a browser-based educational platform serving families through their own devices does not materially stress freshwater systems.

Joint 63rd of 69 in SaaS / Digital Services on this question

No environmental targets of any kind found. No SBTi commitment, registration, or status found on the SBTi target dashboard. No net-zero pledge, no carbon neutral commitment, no renewable energy target, no science-aligned pathway. No CDP disclosure. The company publishes no sustainability goals on its website, in any press release, or in any third-party registry. While a company of this size with negligible emissions does not strictly need SBTi validation, the complete absence of any articulated environmental target — even informal ones — means there is no basis for awarding any score. This is a pure absence of commitment, not a case of a small company correctly not buying offsets.

Joint 49th of 69 in SaaS / Digital Services on this question

No sustainability report, no environmental governance structure, no ESG disclosure, no TCFD alignment, no board-level sustainability oversight found. The company's public-facing pages (About, Contact, Legal) address child data privacy (COPPA/FERPA compliance, last updated March 2026) but contain no environmental governance language. Crystal Labbe is identified as founder and CEO in a press release and aggregator data. There is no evidence that sustainability is a documented business priority or that any environmental responsibility has been formally assigned. The founder personally runs a very small company, and informal owner-driven decision-making is appropriate at this scale — but there is no evidence even of informal environmental awareness. Score of 2 reflects a very small owner-operated company with no public environmental information.

Joint 3rd of 69 in SaaS / Digital Services on this question

No environmental controversies, regulatory actions, greenwashing complaints, climate lobbying, or negative NGO findings found for Miss Humblebee's Academy in any source searched, including InfluenceMap, DeSmog, CDP watchlists, or general media. No trade association memberships with climate-misaligned positions found. The company is a small edtech platform with no structural exposure to fossil-sector commerce, no financial products, no advertising to fossil clients, and no lobbying footprint. Clean record across all Q10 criteria warrants the baseline score of 8 with no deductions. Score of 8 represents a genuinely clean record with no disqualifying findings, though the company is too small to have attracted significant scrutiny from specialist watchdogs.