Graze sustainability score: 31/100
Better than 8% of Food & Beverage (non-meat)
Making progress starts at 46. The highest score on SINK is 71.
Graze is a UK food manufacturer and distributor founded in 2007, headquartered in London. It produces plant-based snacks—nuts, seeds, grains, dried fruit, pulses—predominantly vegan and vegetarian formulations.
More about Graze
Owned by Unilever until December 2025, now acquired by Katjes International. Operates a single facility in Kingston-upon-Thames with approximately £36M annual revenue (2024).
Founded 2007Head office London, United KingdomStaff ~200Revenue ~£36M (2024)Website ↗
Graze publishes impact commitments but lacks quantified emissions baselines or science-aligned targets. No Scope 1, 2, or 3 GHG Protocol disclosures exist despite operating a dedicated UK manufacturing facility. B Corp certification and waste reduction claims are dated; no post-2022 updates confirm progress. Carbon neutral 2030 pledge is unsubstantiated.
Graze scores 31/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Scores are free. Nobody can pay to change a score, speed it up or hide it. Last verified May 2026.
That places Graze joint 698th of 1,023 companies scored, and joint 45th of 51 in Food & Beverage (non-meat).
What is Graze doing well, and where does it fall short?
Strongest on Controversies & Red Flags and Energy Source (7/10, 5/10). Weakest on Emissions Trajectory and Carbon Footprint: Supply Chain (2/10, 3/10).
Where Graze lost points
For each question that lost points, the evidence our public rubric looks for that we didn't find.
What would raise this score
- Whether its emissions are fallingShow its emissions are falling.
- Emissions from its supply chainAssess where its supply-chain emissions come from.
- Its climate targetsSet specific targets with dates.
Every question that lost points
- Emissions from its own operations4/10No full Scope 1 and 2 figures worked out to the GHG Protocol.
- Emissions from its supply chain3/10No assessment of where its supply-chain emissions come from.
- Whether its emissions are falling2/10No evidence its emissions are falling.
- How clean its energy is5/10Less than half its energy shown to be renewable, or no transition plan.
- Its effect on nature4/10Its effect on nature isn't measured or independently verified.
- How it uses materials and handles waste5/10No measurable waste or recycling targets reported publicly.
- Its effect on water4/10No measured water footprint with reduction targets.
- Its climate targets3/10No specific targets with dates.
- How openly it reports5/10No dedicated sustainability role, board oversight or public report.
- Its record on controversies7/10Points deducted for controversies or its business model. The finding is under question 10.
A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Anyone can send us new evidence, free. How to send it.
How is Graze's SINK score calculated?
Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleHas Graze's score changed?
Graze's score has moved from 44 to 31 across 2 recorded reviews, down 13 points.
- 44 → 31-137 November 2026
The small-company exception no longer applies: its parent group files group accounts (Unilever in its 2025 financial year, Katjes International since February 2026). With no published emissions figure, the 0.70x size step now applies.
- Scored 447 November 2026
Correction, 7 November 2026: removed an unsourced emissions figure. Score unchanged.
What evidence is Graze's score based on?
8 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which of the ten questions it informed.
38% of them were published by Graze itself; the rest come from independent sources.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Is this your company? Claim this profile (free)
Use this score in tenders
Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.
Open the score sheet →Send new evidence, free
Scored low because little is published? Publish what you do and send us the link, free. If it holds up, your score changes, and the change is logged on your page.
How to send evidence →Put your score on your website, free
It shows the current band, sector rank and score, and links to this page, so it changes when the score does.
Track this score
Bidding for a public contract? Check if you need a Carbon Reduction Plan, free →
Want your own page like this?
Free, independent, every source shown. Send it to any buyer who asks about your sustainability.
How does Graze compare with other food & beverage (non-meat) companies?
Where Graze sits among food & beverage (non-meat) peers.
Among the 51 major food & beverage (non-meat) brands we've scored, Graze is tied =45th of 51, with 2 others.
Who scores higher in Food & Beverage (non-meat)?
The 3 companies in the sector scoring nearest above Graze.
Red Bull has no quantified emissions data, no supply chain transparency, and growing production volumes with zero evidence of absolute emissions decline.
See the breakdown →Candy Kittens has calculated its carbon footprint via ClimatePartner but publishes no emissions figures or reduction targets.
See the breakdown →Monster's emissions are rising 17% year-on-year while absolute reduction targets remain unvalidated.
See the breakdown →Which companies moved this week, and why.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
We'll send one email to confirm. No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Checking a company?
Search free →Asked to prove you're sustainable?
Get your business scored, free →Been scored?
Find your page and claim it, free →Scores are free. Nobody can pay to change a score, speed it up or hide it.