Danone UK & Ireland sustainability score: 28/100
Better than 31% of Food & Beverage (meat/dairy)
Below expectations starts at 31. The highest score on SINK is 71.
Danone UK & Ireland is the UK and Irish business of the French food group Danone, selling dairy, plant-based (Alpro), water and specialised nutrition brands, including infant formula. Its UK accounts are filed by Nutricia Limited, headquartered in Trowbridge, Wiltshire, and incorporated in 1933.
More about Danone UK & Ireland
It had 959 employees and £1.32 billion revenue in 2025.
Founded 1933Head office Trowbridge, Wiltshire, UKStaff ~959 (Nutricia Limited, 2025 average)Revenue ~£1.32B revenue (Nutricia Limited, 2025)Website ↗
Danone UK & Ireland reports emissions only for its selling business, 654 tCO2e in 2025, which leaves out its factories and its supply chain; Danone group figures do not count here. It says its factories use renewable electricity under certificates, half its vans are electric and 95% of its packaging is recyclable. A plan to fell trees in Rotary Wood for its Harrogate Spring Water business drew strong local opposition and was refused by councillors in April 2026.
Danone UK & Ireland scores 28/100 (Significant gaps) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Scores are free. Nobody can pay to change a score, speed it up or hide it. Last verified November 2026.
That places Danone UK & Ireland joint 783rd of 1,023 companies scored, and joint 9th of 14 in Food & Beverage (meat/dairy).
What is Danone UK & Ireland doing well, and where does it fall short?
Strongest on Controversies & Red Flags and Resource Use & Waste (7/10, 6/10). Weakest on Water Impact and Carbon Footprint: Supply Chain (2/10, 3/10).
Where Danone UK & Ireland lost points
For each question that lost points, the evidence our public rubric looks for that we didn't find.
What would raise this score
- Its effect on waterMonitor its water use and take measures to reduce it.
- Emissions from its supply chainAssess where its supply-chain emissions come from.
- Its effect on natureAssess its effect on nature and publish a basic environmental policy.
Every question that lost points
- Emissions from its own operations5/10No full Scope 1 and 2 figures worked out to the GHG Protocol.
- Emissions from its supply chain3/10No assessment of where its supply-chain emissions come from.
- Whether its emissions are falling4/10No evidence of a year-on-year fall in its total emissions.
- How clean its energy is5/10Less than half its energy shown to be renewable, or no transition plan.
- Its effect on nature3/10No assessment of its effect on nature, and no basic environmental policy.
- How it uses materials and handles waste6/10No verified figures for reuse and recycling across the business.
- Its effect on water2/10No monitoring of water use, or no measures to reduce it.
- Its climate targets4/10Its targets aren't science-based or committed to the Science Based Targets initiative.
- How openly it reports6/10No annual impact report, or no pay linked to climate targets.
- Its record on controversies7/10Points deducted for controversies or its business model. The finding is under question 10.
A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Anyone can send us new evidence, free. How to send it.
How is Danone UK & Ireland's SINK score calculated?
Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleWhat evidence is Danone UK & Ireland's score based on?
17 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which of the ten questions it informed.
29% of them were published by Danone UK & Ireland itself; the rest come from independent sources.
12 of 17 sources are independent of the company.
“Market Based Emissions (tC02e) - Total 654 944”
“Market Based Emissions (tC02e) - Scope 1 26 32”
“14% of our UK & Ireland carbon footprint”
“Emissions reported in this Carbon Reduction Plan are those of the global Danone business”
“5,000 tonnes carbon emissions”
“saving over 800 tonnes of CO”
“Nutricia Homeward delivery vans are either fully electric or use HVO”
“we are progressing year after year on our CO2 reduction targets (-16.1% since 2020)”
“Danone UK & Ireland earned an overall score of 101.4”
“Councillors on the committee vote to refuse the Harrogate Spring Water expansion plan”
“received more than 1,300 objections”
“The company's disclosure on its industry associations does not include clear positions on climate policies.”
“Critics say the move contradicts Danone’s high-profile Forest policy”
“we will remain within our extraction limit of 464 million litres of water per year”
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Is this your company? Claim this profile (free)
Use this score in tenders
Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.
Open the score sheet →Send new evidence, free
Scored low because little is published? Publish what you do and send us the link, free. If it holds up, your score changes, and the change is logged on your page.
How to send evidence →Put your score on your website, free
It shows the current band, sector rank and score, and links to this page, so it changes when the score does.
Track this score
Bidding for a public contract? Check if you need a Carbon Reduction Plan, free →
Want your own page like this?
Free, independent, every source shown. Send it to any buyer who asks about your sustainability.
How does Danone UK & Ireland compare with other food & beverage (meat/dairy) companies?
Where Danone UK & Ireland sits among food & beverage (meat/dairy) peers.
Among the 14 major food & beverage (meat/dairy) brands we've scored, Danone UK & Ireland is tied =9th of 14, with 1 other.
Who scores higher in Food & Beverage (meat/dairy)?
The 3 companies in the sector scoring nearest above Danone UK & Ireland.
Arla's own-site emissions are falling and well assured, but Scope 3 is 98% of its reported total and rose in 2025 as milk volumes grew.
See the breakdown →COOK's operational emissions fell 22% to 3,230 tCO2e in its 2024/25 year but are 43% above its 2017/18 baseline, and it missed its own 2025 reduction target before replacing it with a per-kilo target.
See the breakdown →Little Moons' own emissions fell from 1,743 to 1,015 tCO2e, mostly because it closed its Kettering factory and moved production back to London.
See the breakdown →Which companies moved this week, and why.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
We'll send one email to confirm. No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Checking a company?
Search free →Asked to prove you're sustainable?
Get your business scored, free →Been scored?
Find your page and claim it, free →Scores are free. Nobody can pay to change a score, speed it up or hide it.