Little Moons sustainability score: 29/100
Better than 46% of Food & Beverage (meat/dairy)
Below expectations starts at 31. The highest score on SINK is 71.
Limited independent evidence: only two independent sources cover this company. The score may change as more evidence appears.
Little Moons is a London-based maker of mochi ice cream, mostly dairy gelato wrapped in rice dough, sold through supermarkets. Its group accounts are filed by LM Topco Limited, incorporated in 2022; its roots go back to 2008 (V&H Limited, 06603979).
More about Little Moons
It had about 289 employees and £56.6 million revenue in its year to January 2026.
Founded 2022Head office London, UKStaff ~289Revenue ~£56.6M revenue (group, period to 2 Jan 2026)Website ↗
Little Moons' own emissions fell from 1,743 to 1,015 tCO2e, mostly because it closed its Kettering factory and moved production back to London. It gives its supply-chain footprint only per kilogram of product, with no total, so the size deduction applies. Its factory electricity comes from UK wind and solar under certificates, but gas is still about a third of its energy. Its only climate target is a 30% cut in supply-chain intensity by 2030. It recycles 63% of its factory waste and gives surplus away, but publishes no water data.
Little Moons scores 29/100 (Significant gaps) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Scores are free. Nobody can pay to change a score, speed it up or hide it. Last verified November 2026.
That places Little Moons joint 753rd of 1,023 companies scored, and joint 7th of 14 in Food & Beverage (meat/dairy).
What is Little Moons doing well, and where does it fall short?
Strongest on Controversies & Red Flags and Carbon Footprint: Operations (8/10, 6/10). Weakest on Water Impact and Targets & Commitments (1/10, 3/10).
Where Little Moons lost points
For each question that lost points, the evidence our public rubric looks for that we didn't find.
What would raise this score
- Its effect on waterPublish figures for its water use.
- Its climate targetsSet specific targets with dates.
- Whether its emissions are fallingShow a year-on-year fall in its total emissions.
Every question that lost points
- Emissions from its own operations6/10Its own emissions aren't independently verified or tracked over several years.
- Emissions from its supply chain5/10Most of its supply-chain (Scope 3) emissions aren't measured.
- Whether its emissions are falling4/10No evidence of a year-on-year fall in its total emissions.
- How clean its energy is5/10Less than half its energy shown to be renewable, or no transition plan.
- Its effect on nature4/10Its effect on nature isn't measured or independently verified.
- How it uses materials and handles waste5/10No measurable waste or recycling targets reported publicly.
- Its effect on water1/10No figures for its water use.
- Its climate targets3/10No specific targets with dates.
- How openly it reports6/10No annual impact report, or no pay linked to climate targets.
A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Anyone can send us new evidence, free. How to send it.
How is Little Moons's SINK score calculated?
Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleHas Little Moons's score changed?
Little Moons's score has been reviewed 2 times and currently stands where it started, at 29.
- 29 → 297 November 2026
Correction, 7 November 2026: removed an unsourced emissions figure. Score unchanged.
- Scored 293 November 2026
Initial public score 29 (publish-draft)
What evidence is Little Moons's score based on?
10 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which of the ten questions it informed.
30% of them were published by Little Moons itself; the rest come from independent sources.
“Gas combustion 387 526”
“In 2025, that was 3.91KgCO2e/Kg Product.”
“Since 2025, 100% of our mangoes have achieved Silver certification through SAI Platform's Farm Sustainability Assessment (FSA).”
“made from FSC-certified board from sustainably-managed forests”
“Little Moons earned an overall score of 89.7”
“Alongside our innovation & sustainability director, Emma Love, I am responsible for driving this through the business.”
“Little Moons has borrowed another £5m from its shareholders, having breached its loan terms shortly after closing its Kettering factory”
“We did not find any past criticisms of Little Moons.”
“In an ‘unusual situation’, the mochi maker has u-turned on plans to switch all its production to a new factory in Kettering, leaving staff angry”
“The frozen treat brand said it aims to source 80 per cent of its ingredients from FSA Silver suppliers by 2030.”
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Is this your company? Claim this profile (free)
Use this score in tenders
Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.
Open the score sheet →Send new evidence, free
Scored low because little is published? Publish what you do and send us the link, free. If it holds up, your score changes, and the change is logged on your page.
How to send evidence →Put your score on your website, free
It shows the current band, sector rank and score, and links to this page, so it changes when the score does.
Track this score
Bidding for a public contract? Check if you need a Carbon Reduction Plan, free →
Want your own page like this?
Free, independent, every source shown. Send it to any buyer who asks about your sustainability.
How does Little Moons compare with other food & beverage (meat/dairy) companies?
Where Little Moons sits among food & beverage (meat/dairy) peers.
Among the 14 major food & beverage (meat/dairy) brands we've scored, Little Moons is tied =7th of 14, with 1 other.
Who scores higher in Food & Beverage (meat/dairy)?
The 3 companies in the sector scoring nearest above Little Moons.
Danone's emissions fell to 18.6 MtCO2e in 2025, 21% below 2020 on its SBTi boundary against a 34.8% cut targeted for 2030. 94% of its electricity is renewable, mostly through certificates, but fossil fuels are still 56% of its energy.
See the breakdown →Butternut Box's footprint was 265,540 tCO2e in 2025, about 80% of it the ingredients it buys, mostly meat.
See the breakdown →Arla's own-site emissions are falling and well assured, but Scope 3 is 98% of its reported total and rose in 2025 as milk volumes grew.
See the breakdown →Which companies moved this week, and why.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
We'll send one email to confirm. No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Checking a company?
Search free →Asked to prove you're sustainable?
Get your business scored, free →Been scored?
Find your page and claim it, free →Scores are free. Nobody can pay to change a score, speed it up or hide it.