Capgemini sustainability score: 62/100
Better than 97% of Consulting / Professional Services
Exceptional starts at 75. The highest score on SINK is 71.
Capgemini is a French IT services and consulting group headquartered in Paris; Capgemini SE is registered from 1984 and its roots go back to 1967. It had about 423,400 staff and €22.5 billion revenue in 2025.
Founded 1984Head office Paris, FranceStaff ~423,400 (31 Dec 2025)Revenue ~€22.5B (FY2025)Website ↗
Capgemini cut its total emissions 42% between 2019 and 2025, to 659,000 tCO2e, with 100% renewable electricity and SBTi-validated targets. Its largest supply-chain category, purchased goods and services, is only about 9% below 2019 against a 50% target for 2030. It has held IT contracts with oil and gas producer Equinor (formerly Statoil).
Capgemini scores 62/100 (Leading practice) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Scores are free. Nobody can pay to change a score, speed it up or hide it. Last verified October 2026.
That places Capgemini joint 6th of 1,023 companies scored, and joint 1st of 30 in Consulting / Professional Services.
What is Capgemini doing well, and where does it fall short?
Strongest on Carbon Footprint: Operations and Carbon Footprint: Supply Chain (9/10, 8/10). Weakest on Resource Use & Waste and Water Impact (4/10, 4/10).
Where Capgemini lost points
For each question that lost points, the evidence our public rubric looks for that we didn't find.
What would raise this score
- How it uses materials and handles wasteReport measurable waste or recycling targets publicly.
- Its effect on waterMeasure its water footprint and set reduction targets.
- Its effect on natureMeasure its effect on nature and have it independently verified.
Every question that lost points
- Emissions from its own operations9/10No verified figures published with their method and a falling trend.
- Emissions from its supply chain8/10Its Scope 3 emissions aren't fully verified or falling year on year.
- Whether its emissions are falling7/10No consistent fall over several years across its operations and supply chain.
- How clean its energy is8/10Its own operations aren't shown to run on 100% renewable energy.
- Its effect on nature5/10Its effect on nature isn't measured or independently verified.
- How it uses materials and handles waste4/10No measurable waste or recycling targets reported publicly.
- Its effect on water4/10No measured water footprint with reduction targets.
- Its climate targets8/10No validated long-term net zero target.
- How openly it reports7/10No annual impact report, or no pay linked to climate targets.
- Its record on controversies5/10Points deducted for controversies or its business model. The finding is under question 10.
A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Anyone can send us new evidence, free. How to send it.
How is Capgemini's SINK score calculated?
Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleWhat evidence is Capgemini's score based on?
16 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which of the ten questions it informed.
56% of them were published by Capgemini itself; the rest come from independent sources.
“6,661”
“Revenues of €22,465 million in 2025, up +1.7%”
“We delivered a 94% reduction in Scope 1 and 2 emissions”
“8,747”
“301,522”
“we are also committed to minimizing our use of natural resources such as water, taking steps to enhance biodiversity, and reducing waste”
“Understand our dependencies and impacts on nature, particularly for our sites in areas of biodiversity risk or near biodiversity sensitive areas”
“To assess the corporate biodiversity footprint,”
“Capgemini is announcing the validation by SBTi of its new long-term (2040) and short term (2030) net zero carbon reduction targets.”
“Capgemini announced today the signing of a multi-year contract extension, within the application management area, with Equinor”
“signed a new three-year strategic framework agreement with Norwegian multinational oil and gas company Statoil”
“the consultancy has registered a 26% overall drop in these emissions, even as the business itself has expanded.”
“En 2023, près de 14 534 MWh ont été générés par de grands panneaux solaires installés sur nos campus en Inde”
“It has installed 11.5MWp of on-premises solar plants across all campuses in India.”
“The use of 98% renewable electricity across its global operations, with a goal to reach 100% by 2025.”
“Capgemini has become the latest major consulting firm to announce it has received validation for its net zero targets by Science Based Targets initiative.”
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Is this your company? Claim this profile (free)
Use this score in tenders
Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.
Open the score sheet →Send new evidence, free
Scored low because little is published? Publish what you do and send us the link, free. If it holds up, your score changes, and the change is logged on your page.
How to send evidence →Put your score on your website, free
It shows the current band, sector rank and score, and links to this page, so it changes when the score does.
Track this score
Bidding for a public contract? Check if you need a Carbon Reduction Plan, free →
Want your own page like this?
Free, independent, every source shown. Send it to any buyer who asks about your sustainability.
How does Capgemini compare with other consulting / professional services companies?
Capgemini shares top spot among consulting / professional services peers.
Among the 30 major consulting / professional services brands we've scored, Capgemini is tied =1st of 30, with 1 other.
Who comes next in Consulting / Professional Services?
Capgemini leads its sector. These are the next 3 down.
Freshfields has cut operational emissions 80% through renewable electricity purchasing and efficiency, but Scope 3 is rising year-on-year, driven by business travel that the firm says is hard to cut given US growth.
See the breakdown →Slaughter and May has set science-backed net-zero targets and reports third-party verified emissions, but reported total emissions rose 48% year-on-year due to methodology changes and refurbishment.
See the breakdown →Amesto is a Nordic accounting, software and professional services firm with small operational emissions.
See the breakdown →Which companies moved this week, and why.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
We'll send one email to confirm. No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Checking a company?
Search free →Asked to prove you're sustainable?
Get your business scored, free →Been scored?
Find your page and claim it, free →Scores are free. Nobody can pay to change a score, speed it up or hide it.