Sustainability comparison

The Kraft Heinz Company vs Danone S.A. Sustainability: SINK Score Comparison

Danone S.A. scores 8 points higher than The Kraft Heinz Company on SINK.

Question-by-question

How each category compares

Category
The
Danone
Carbon Footprint: Operations
7/10
8/10
Carbon Footprint: Supply Chain
5/10
8/10
Emissions Trajectory
4/10
7/10
Energy Source
4/10
5/10
Nature & Biodiversity Impact
4/10
6/10
Resource Use & Waste
5/10
5/10
Water Impact
5/10
5/10
Targets & Commitments
6/10
9/10
Transparency & Accountability
6/10
9/10
Controversies & Red Flags
5/10
5/10
Frequently asked

The Kraft Heinz Company vs Danone S.A., answered.

Which is more sustainable, The Kraft Heinz Company or Danone S.A.?

Danone S.A. is more sustainable according to SINK's scores, scoring 39/100 vs The Kraft Heinz Company's 31/100, a difference of 8 points.

What is The Kraft Heinz Company's SINK sustainability score?

The Kraft Heinz Company scores 31/100 on SINK (Below expectations). Kraft Heinz reports emissions data with third-party assurance but Scope 3 remains 95% of total with qualified audits and unverified categories. The company is delivering Scope 1&2 reductions but Scope 3 shows no absolute decline. Early 2025 removal of 2030 climate targets from its website signals political capitulation rather than confidence in delivery.

What is Danone S.A.'s SINK sustainability score?

Danone S.A. scores 39/100 on SINK (Below expectations). Danone's emissions fell to 18.6 MtCO2e in 2025, 21% below 2020 on its SBTi boundary against a 34.8% cut targeted for 2030. 94% of its electricity is renewable, mostly through certificates, but fossil fuels are still 56% of its energy. Plastic is its weak spot: 0.68 Mt of plastic packaging, a French duty-of-vigilance case over plastics settled in 2025, and a pending complaint over '100% recycled' claims.

How does SINK compare The Kraft Heinz Company and Danone S.A.?

Both companies are rated on the same 10-question SINK rubric: Scope 1/2/3 carbon footprint, energy source, nature and biodiversity, resource use, water, emissions trajectory, science-based targets, transparency, and controversies. Scores are 0–100, based on public data, and fully reproducible.

See the full leaderboard: 1,023 companies ranked.

View the full leaderboard →