Danone S.A. scores 8 points higher than The Kraft Heinz Company on SINK.
Danone S.A. is more sustainable according to SINK's scores, scoring 39/100 vs The Kraft Heinz Company's 31/100, a difference of 8 points.
The Kraft Heinz Company scores 31/100 on SINK (Below expectations). Kraft Heinz reports emissions data with third-party assurance but Scope 3 remains 95% of total with qualified audits and unverified categories. The company is delivering Scope 1&2 reductions but Scope 3 shows no absolute decline. Early 2025 removal of 2030 climate targets from its website signals political capitulation rather than confidence in delivery.
Danone S.A. scores 39/100 on SINK (Below expectations). Danone's emissions fell to 18.6 MtCO2e in 2025, 21% below 2020 on its SBTi boundary against a 34.8% cut targeted for 2030. 94% of its electricity is renewable, mostly through certificates, but fossil fuels are still 56% of its energy. Plastic is its weak spot: 0.68 Mt of plastic packaging, a French duty-of-vigilance case over plastics settled in 2025, and a pending complaint over '100% recycled' claims.
Both companies are rated on the same 10-question SINK rubric: Scope 1/2/3 carbon footprint, energy source, nature and biodiversity, resource use, water, emissions trajectory, science-based targets, transparency, and controversies. Scores are 0–100, based on public data, and fully reproducible.
See the full leaderboard: 1,023 companies ranked.
View the full leaderboard →