Sustainability comparison

Henkel AG & Co. KGaA vs The Procter & Gamble Company Sustainability: SINK Score Comparison

Henkel AG & Co. KGaA scores 10 points higher than The Procter & Gamble Company on SINK.

Question-by-question

How each category compares

Category
Henkel
The
Carbon Footprint: Operations
8/10
8/10
Carbon Footprint: Supply Chain
7/10
7/10
Emissions Trajectory
6/10
3/10
Energy Source
6/10
6/10
Nature & Biodiversity Impact
5/10
4/10
Resource Use & Waste
6/10
5/10
Water Impact
5/10
5/10
Targets & Commitments
8/10
6/10
Transparency & Accountability
7/10
7/10
Controversies & Red Flags
7/10
3/10
Frequently asked

Henkel AG & Co. KGaA vs The Procter & Gamble Company, answered.

Which is more sustainable, Henkel AG & Co. KGaA or The Procter & Gamble Company?

Henkel AG & Co. KGaA is more sustainable according to SINK's scores, scoring 38/100 vs The Procter & Gamble Company's 28/100, a difference of 10 points.

What is Henkel AG & Co. KGaA's SINK sustainability score?

Henkel AG & Co. KGaA scores 38/100 on SINK (Below expectations). Henkel reports comprehensive climate data with CDP A rating and SBTi-validated absolute targets, but supply-chain emissions data quality lags operations. Nature biodiversity risks remain largely unquantified despite policy commitments. Water targets are intensity-based, not absolute. Trade association memberships in climate-skeptical bodies create strategic misalignment.

What is The Procter & Gamble Company's SINK sustainability score?

The Procter & Gamble Company scores 28/100 on SINK (Significant gaps). P&G has cut its own Scope 1 and 2 emissions, but its Scope 3, mostly from consumers using its products, keeps rising, and its supply-chain targets are per unit, not absolute. Break Free From Plastic's 2023 audit named it among the top 10 global plastic polluters, and it dropped its no-degradation forest pledge in 2023.

How does SINK compare Henkel AG & Co. KGaA and The Procter & Gamble Company?

Both companies are rated on the same 10-question SINK rubric: Scope 1/2/3 carbon footprint, energy source, nature and biodiversity, resource use, water, emissions trajectory, science-based targets, transparency, and controversies. Scores are 0–100, based on public data, and fully reproducible.

See the full leaderboard: 1,023 companies ranked.

View the full leaderboard →