Henkel AG & Co. KGaA scores 10 points higher than The Procter & Gamble Company on SINK.
Henkel AG & Co. KGaA is more sustainable according to SINK's scores, scoring 38/100 vs The Procter & Gamble Company's 28/100, a difference of 10 points.
Henkel AG & Co. KGaA scores 38/100 on SINK (Below expectations). Henkel reports comprehensive climate data with CDP A rating and SBTi-validated absolute targets, but supply-chain emissions data quality lags operations. Nature biodiversity risks remain largely unquantified despite policy commitments. Water targets are intensity-based, not absolute. Trade association memberships in climate-skeptical bodies create strategic misalignment.
The Procter & Gamble Company scores 28/100 on SINK (Significant gaps). P&G has cut its own Scope 1 and 2 emissions, but its Scope 3, mostly from consumers using its products, keeps rising, and its supply-chain targets are per unit, not absolute. Break Free From Plastic's 2023 audit named it among the top 10 global plastic polluters, and it dropped its no-degradation forest pledge in 2023.
Both companies are rated on the same 10-question SINK rubric: Scope 1/2/3 carbon footprint, energy source, nature and biodiversity, resource use, water, emissions trajectory, science-based targets, transparency, and controversies. Scores are 0–100, based on public data, and fully reproducible.
See the full leaderboard: 1,023 companies ranked.
View the full leaderboard →