Carbon Footprint — Operations: How does Yodel Delivery Network score?

Yodel states on its CSR page (2023/24 report) that it has measured its carbon footprint for over 8 years using third-party carbon reporting partners, covering the period 1 July 2021 to 30 June 2023. However, no specific absolute Scope 1 or Scope 2 figures in tonnes CO₂e are publicly disclosed anywhere in the available data. The company claims approximately 20,000 tonnes per annum removed in absolute terms over the 8-year period since 2016 baseline, and a 44% reduction in carbon per parcel since

Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain: How does Yodel Delivery Network score?

No formal Scope 3 data is publicly disclosed. Yodel has launched a CSR Supplier Awards programme to recognise suppliers demonstrating environmental sustainability, suggesting nascent supply chain engagement. The primary supply chain complexity is vehicle manufacturing (HGVs, trailers), fuel supply, and contracted couriers — a moderately complex supply chain for a mid-sized logistics operator. No supplier emissions data, no Scope 3 category quantification, and no formal supplier engagement progra

Emissions Trajectory: How does Yodel Delivery Network score?

Yodel claims approximately 20,000 tonnes per annum removed in absolute terms since baseline 2016, and May 2022 reporting described five consecutive years of reducing its carbon footprint (2016–2022). The company reports a 44% reduction in carbon intensity (CO₂ per parcel) since 2016 baseline, and a 32% reduction since 2016 per its careers CSR page. However, volumes grew to a record 191 million parcels in 2023, and no absolute tonnage figures for 2022–2024 are published. The critical distinction

Energy Source: How does Yodel Delivery Network score?

Yodel states it shifted to 100% renewable electricity across all its sites (reported in May 2022 context). The company also trialled HVO (hydrotreated vegetable oil) for its shunter fleet, noting potential carbon savings of up to 90% compared to diesel. New solar-powered double-decker trailers (120 units) were introduced in June 2023. However, the core delivery fleet remains diesel/fossil-fuel powered — the 100% renewable electricity claim applies to sites/depots, not the vehicle fleet which is

Nature & Biodiversity Impact: How does Yodel Delivery Network score?

No nature, biodiversity, or TNFD disclosure found. As a logistics company, Yodel's primary nature interface is through land use (depot sites and roads across England, Scotland, and Wales) and urban air quality impacts from its fleet. No deforestation risks, no ecosystem restoration activities, and no biodiversity policy found in any published document. The company partnered with Carma Earth and a Green Task Force to plant 1,200 trees, which is a minor gesture. No TNFD alignment, no biodiversity

Resource Use & Waste: How does Yodel Delivery Network score?

Yodel has introduced 100% recyclable post bags produced using oyster shells — a notable materials innovation. The company introduced a vehicle age policy (all owned vehicles must be under 3 years old) which reduces waste from ageing fleet. New Schmitz Cargobull S.BO Pace lightweight trailers were adopted to improve fuel efficiency and reduce resource consumption. The CSR Supplier Awards recognise partner sustainability performance. However, no formal circular economy targets, no published waste

Water Impact: How does Yodel Delivery Network score?

No water consumption data, water policy, or water reduction targets are published anywhere in Yodel's available CSR materials. As a logistics company (depots, vehicle washing, facilities), water use is moderate rather than intensive — not a water-scarce industry like agriculture or beverages. No evidence of pollution incidents, discharge issues, or watershed impacts found. The absence of any water reporting or strategy results in a score of 2, reflecting the relatively low inherent water intensi

Targets & Commitments: How does Yodel Delivery Network score?

Yodel's stated target is carbon neutrality by 2035, referenced consistently in CEO statements from 2022 onwards. No SBTi commitment or validation found. No formal science-based target, no net-zero target aligned with a credible pathway, and no SBTi dashboard presence detected. The 2035 carbon neutrality target is self-set, unverified, and lacks a published pathway or interim milestones. The company has not disclosed what proportion would be achieved through reductions versus offsets. The target

Transparency & Accountability: How does Yodel Delivery Network score?

Yodel publishes a CSR report (2023/24 edition referenced on its website) compiled with third-party carbon reporting partners. The report covers the period July 2021 to June 2023, meaning it falls within the 2022-onwards window required. However, the absolute emissions totals are not publicly disclosed; key metrics (Scope 1, 2, 3 in tonnes) are absent from public-facing materials. No TCFD or CSRD disclosure found. No board-level sustainability governance structure publicly described. No executive

Controversies & Red Flags: How does Yodel Delivery Network score?

Starting at 8. No environmental regulatory fines, no greenwashing rulings, no climate lawsuits, and no InfluenceMap profile found for Yodel. The company is not flagged on any credible NGO or regulatory watchlist for environmental harm. No lobbying activity against climate policy identified. The company has experienced significant service quality controversies (BBC Watchdog 2012-2016, MoneySavingExpert worst delivery company surveys) but these are customer service rather than environmental issues

← Back to leaderboard

Yodel Delivery Network Sustainability Score: 30/100

◌ Pending Review

📦 Shipping / LogisticsGBSignificant gaps

~5,000 employees~£500-700M revenueRanked #374 of 503Website ↗

Yodel Delivery Network is a shipping / logistics company headquartered in GB. Based on our 10-question rubric, Yodel Delivery Network scores 30/100 — rated as showing significant gaps in its sustainability performance.

SINK Score Breakdown

How we calculated Yodel Delivery Network's score using our formula: (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × Scale Penalty

Base Impact

Shipping / Logistics industry ceiling

Performance

33/100

10 questions scored below

Scale Penalty

0.95x

emissions volume multiplier

SINK Score

(0.3 × 30 + 0.7 × 33) × 0.95 = 30

10-Question Rubric Breakdown

Click any question to see the reasoning, sources and community challenges.

3/10

Carbon Footprint — Operations

2/10

Carbon Footprint — Supply Chain

3/10

Emissions Trajectory

4/10

Energy Source

2/10

Nature & Biodiversity Impact

4/10

Resource Use & Waste

2/10

Water Impact

3/10

Targets & Commitments

3/10

Transparency & Accountability

Q10

7/10

Controversies & Red Flags

Community Verification

0 verifications · 0 challenges · Scored using SINK editorial review

Last scored: 11 Apr 2026

Think this score is wrong?

Challenge any question above with evidence. All challenges are published publicly.

Read methodology →

More in Shipping / Logistics

46Royal Mail 41DPD (Geopost)38National Express (Mobico Group)37Evri 32Kuehne + Nagel International 32DHL Group (Deutsche Post)