T.REX ARMS sustainability score: 21/100

Joint 17th of 19 in Industrial Equipment / Machinery on this question

No formal GHG disclosure of any kind has been published by T.Rex Arms — no sustainability report, no CDP filing, no national registry entry (US EPA FLIGHT tool shows no regulated facility; no SECR equivalent applies as a US company). The company operates a single manufacturing facility in Centerville, TN, thermoforming Kydex plastic (an acrylic/PVC alloy) and assembling nylon soft goods. Mark based on the company's size and sector. Under the 0–4 SME guidance, the negligible estimated physical footprint prevents a score of 0; however, even basic self-calculated emissions from energy bills have not been evidenced, warranting a 2.

Joint 16th of 19 in Industrial Equipment / Machinery on this question

No Scope 3 data has been published. The supply chain consists primarily of Kydex sheet stock (an acrylic/PVC alloy manufactured in Bloomsburg, PA by KYDEX LLC), nylon webbing and hardware, and a curated selection of third-party products resold from US domestic manufacturers. The company's 'Made in USA' page confirms all holsters and Kydex gear are made at the Centerville shop, with other products sourced from 'trusted domestic manufacturers.' The supply chain is predominantly domestic, relatively short, and low-complexity compared to a global apparel or electronics company. However, no formal assessment of purchased goods emissions or supplier engagement has been evidenced. The short, domestic supply chain with basic awareness of supplier locations justifies a 2 rather than 0.

Joint 15th of 19 in Industrial Equipment / Machinery on this question

No trajectory data exists — no multi-year energy bills, no emissions trend, and no proxy data (e.g. lower energy consumption year-on-year) has been published. The company appears to have been growing modestly (from a garage startup in 2013 to a ~50-100 person shop), which would likely imply stable or slightly increasing absolute emissions. However, as a small light-manufacturing SME, the absence of data is less consequential than for a large emitter. A score of 2 reflects: stable/small company, no evidence of emissions growth, no formal tracking, no evidence of reduction.

Joint 18th of 19 in Industrial Equipment / Machinery on this question

No information on energy sourcing has been published — no green tariff, no renewable energy commitment, no on-site generation, and no RE100 membership. The facility at 758 Industrial Road, Centerville, TN, would draw from the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) grid, which has a mixed generation mix including nuclear, hydro, natural gas, and coal. No evidence of efficiency investments or renewable procurement has been found. As a small light-manufacturing operation (thermoforming ovens, lighting, HVAC) with minimal energy consumption relative to heavy industry, a score of 2 is appropriate — minimal energy consumer with no formal energy strategy and no evidence of environmental awareness regarding energy sourcing.

Joint 8th of 19 in Industrial Equipment / Machinery on this question

T.Rex Arms has no published biodiversity policy, TNFD disclosure, or nature-risk assessment. Primary materials are Kydex (acrylic/PVC) and nylon — both petroleum-derived synthetics that carry upstream fossil extraction and refining impacts, but the quantities used by a company of this size are very small. No deforestation exposure was identified. The company's domestic supply chain and small scale mean the absolute nature impact is low. No evidence of operations in high-risk ecosystems. The absence of any documented nature awareness, combined with use of PVC-containing materials (which carry documented environmental persistence concerns), precludes a higher score; however the negligible physical scale warrants a 3 rather than 0.

Joint 18th of 19 in Industrial Equipment / Machinery on this question

No waste data, recycling programme, or circularity targets have been published. The primary manufacturing process involves thermoforming Kydex sheets — a process that produces offcut material. Kydex is technically recyclable per the supplier, but T.Rex Arms has not disclosed any scrap reclamation or waste minimisation programme. Nylon soft goods manufacturing produces fabric waste. The company has no published supplier sustainability requirements. There is also no take-back or end-of-life programme for holsters (durable goods in PVC/acrylic). Basic recycling at office level is plausible but unconfirmed. A score of 2 reflects the absence of any documented waste strategy beyond what would be standard for a small light-manufacturing shop.

Joint 8th of 19 in Industrial Equipment / Machinery on this question

No water consumption data has been published. Kydex thermoforming is not a water-intensive process — it involves heat and vacuum forming without significant water use or chemical discharge. There is no evidence of water pollution incidents or non-compliance. The manufacturing process (forming plastic sheets, sewing nylon, assembling hardware) presents low inherent water risk. For a service/light-manufacturing company with genuinely low water exposure and no evidence of chemical discharge, a score of 4 is appropriate under the rubric guidance for companies with negligible water impact and basic awareness.

19th of 19 in Industrial Equipment / Machinery on this question

No environmental targets of any kind have been published — no net-zero commitment, no energy reduction target, no SBTi registration (confirmed by absence from the SBTi target dashboard), no CDP disclosure, no informal goals on the company website. The company's public communications focus entirely on 2A political advocacy, product development, and community engagement. There is no indication of reduction-first strategy, offset use (positive or negative), or any forward-looking climate commitment. A score of 0 is correct — no targets, no reduction strategy.

19th of 19 in Industrial Equipment / Machinery on this question

No sustainability information has been published — no impact report, no ESG page, no TCFD/CSRD disclosure, no board oversight of environmental matters, and no dedicated sustainability role. The company's website contains no environmental commitments, energy data, or material disclosures beyond product descriptions and political advocacy content. There is no evidence of sustainability being a documented business priority. For a company of this size (~50-100 employees) formal governance structures are not expected, but even minimal transparency (a page on environmental approach, energy bills shared on request) has not been evidenced. A score of 0 reflects total absence of environmental transparency or accountability structure.

Joint 1st of 19 in Industrial Equipment / Machinery on this question

Starting at 8. No environmental regulatory actions, fines, greenwashing rulings, or NGO environmental critiques were found against T.Rex Arms. The company is not in a structural enablement pattern for fossil-sector commerce and does not meet any of the four infrastructure criteria. The company's documented lobbying activity is confined to 2A gun-rights advocacy in Tennessee (opposing NFA restrictions, carry bans, and ammunition taxes) and support for GOA's NFA lawsuit — this is political/constitutional advocacy unrelated to climate policy. No evidence of lobbying against climate regulations, no misaligned trade association memberships on climate, and no InfluenceMap coverage. The Mother Jones investigation found claims about military contracts to be unsubstantiated, but this is not an environmental controversy. No deductions apply. Score remains 8.