RAKO (Lasselsberger, s.r.o.) sustainability score: 25/100
Below expectations starts at 31. The highest score on SINK is 71.
RAKO (Lasselsberger, s.r.o.) is a ceramic tile manufacturer headquartered in the Czech Republic with five production plants. The company produces approximately 30 million sqm of tiles annually and supplies 50+ countries.
More about RAKO (Lasselsberger, s.r.o.)
RAKO is part of the Lasselsberger Group, which operates a vertically integrated minerals division supplying raw materials including kaolin, clay, and feldspar.
Head office CZStaff ~1,000–1,500Revenue ~€150–300M (estimated; no public figure — based on 30M sqm annual production, sector benchmarks, and EMIS/aggregator data; treat with caution)Website ↗
RAKO manufactures ~30M sqm of ceramic tiles annually across five Czech plants. The company publishes no GHG data, supply chain emissions, reduction targets, or science-based commitments. Operational practices in waste recycling and energy efficiency exist but lack quantification.
RAKO (Lasselsberger, s.r.o.) scores 25/100 (Significant gaps) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Scores are free. Nobody can pay to change a score, speed it up or hide it. Last verified July 2026.
That places RAKO (Lasselsberger, s.r.o.) joint 871st of 1,023 companies scored, and 4th of 5 in Building Materials / Ceramics / Glass / Cement.
What is RAKO (Lasselsberger, s.r.o.) doing well, and where does it fall short?
Strongest on Controversies & Red Flags and Resource Use & Waste (7/10, 4/10). Weakest on Carbon Footprint: Supply Chain and Emissions Trajectory (1/10, 1/10).
Where RAKO (Lasselsberger, s.r.o.) lost points
For each question that lost points, the evidence our public rubric looks for that we didn't find.
What would raise this score
- Emissions from its supply chainAssess where its supply-chain emissions come from.
- Whether its emissions are fallingShow its emissions are falling, even from energy bills or mileage.
- Its climate targetsSet emissions reduction targets.
Every question that lost points
- Emissions from its own operations2/10No emissions figures for its own operations, not even an estimate from energy bills.
- Emissions from its supply chain1/10No assessment of where its supply-chain emissions come from.
- Whether its emissions are falling1/10No evidence its emissions are falling, not even from energy bills or mileage.
- How clean its energy is2/10No renewable energy tariff or major efficiency investment shown.
- Its effect on nature3/10No assessment of its effect on nature, and no basic environmental policy.
- How it uses materials and handles waste4/10No measurable waste or recycling targets reported publicly.
- Its effect on water3/10No monitoring of water use, or no measures to reduce it.
- Its climate targets1/10No emissions reduction targets.
- How openly it reports2/10No published sustainability data, or no one named as responsible for it.
- Its record on controversies7/10Points deducted for controversies or its business model. The finding is under question 10.
A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Anyone can send us new evidence, free. How to send it.
How is RAKO (Lasselsberger, s.r.o.)'s SINK score calculated?
Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleWhat evidence is RAKO (Lasselsberger, s.r.o.)'s score based on?
8 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which of the ten questions it informed.
50% of them were published by RAKO (Lasselsberger, s.r.o.) itself; the rest come from independent sources.
“Our company is certified by the ISO 50001 energy management system”
“supplies more than 50 countries worldwide from its base in Czechia”
“reduction of CO2 / square metre of tiles, dust and noise emissions”
“average water consumption per square meter of manufactured tiles is around 20 L, and energy consumption is around 32 kWh”
“emissions associated with natural gas consumption are estimated at 265 kg of CO2 per tonne”
“politika klimatických změn, environmentální politika ... Climate change, biodiversity and sustainable development”
“We use more than 95% of our own raw materials from local natural resources”
“we strive to work to minimize environmental risks, use resources efficiently, preserve biodiversity and reduce emissions”
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Is this your company? Claim this profile (free)
Use this score in tenders
Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.
Open the score sheet →Send new evidence, free
Scored low because little is published? Publish what you do and send us the link, free. If it holds up, your score changes, and the change is logged on your page.
How to send evidence →Put your score on your website, free
It shows the current band, sector rank and score, and links to this page, so it changes when the score does.
Track this score
Bidding for a public contract? Check if you need a Carbon Reduction Plan, free →
Want your own page like this?
Free, independent, every source shown. Send it to any buyer who asks about your sustainability.
How does RAKO (Lasselsberger, s.r.o.) compare with other building materials / ceramics / glass / cement companies?
Where RAKO (Lasselsberger, s.r.o.) sits among building materials / ceramics / glass / cement peers.
Among the 5 major building materials / ceramics / glass / cement brands we've scored, RAKO (Lasselsberger, s.r.o.) sits 4th of 5.
Who scores higher in Building Materials / Ceramics / Glass / Cement?
The 3 companies in the sector scoring nearest above RAKO (Lasselsberger, s.r.o.).
VELUX's total footprint fell from 1.19 MtCO2e in 2020 to 1.0 MtCO2e in 2025, and its electricity is 100% renewable, mostly from new Spanish solar parks.
See the breakdown →Villeroy & Boch reports GHG data across all scopes and operates under zero-waste principles with EcoVadis Platinum validation.
See the breakdown →Royal Mosa, a mid-sized Dutch ceramic tile manufacturer, has no published company-level GHG data despite energy-intensive operations.
See the breakdown →Which companies moved this week, and why.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
We'll send one email to confirm. No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Checking a company?
Search free →Asked to prove you're sustainable?
Get your business scored, free →Been scored?
Find your page and claim it, free →Scores are free. Nobody can pay to change a score, speed it up or hide it.