Professional Sports Clubs

Manchester City Football Club sustainability score: 56/100

56/100
Making progress
Joint 2nd of 22 in Professional Sports Clubs

Better than 86% of Professional Sports Clubs

Leading practice starts at 60. The highest score on SINK is 71.

Is this your company? Claim this profile (free)

About Manchester City Football Club

Manchester City Football Club, founded 1894, is a professional football club based in Manchester, England, competing in the Premier League. The club operates the City Football Academy and Etihad Stadium, generating revenue from ticketing, broadcasting, merchandise, and commercial partnerships including principal sponsorship from Etihad Airways.

Founded 1894Head office GBStaff ~800Revenue ~£694MWebsite ↗

Read Manchester City Football Club's own report ↗

Our verdict

Manchester City reports 21 years of sustainability data but lacks third-party verification of emissions claims. Scope 3 emissions dominate at 89% of total reported output; methodology deviates from GHG Protocol standards. No SBTi validation of net-zero target. Etihad Airways sponsorship and past greenwashing allegations undermine climate credibility.

Manchester City Football Club scores 56/100 (Making progress) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Scores are free. Nobody can pay to change a score, speed it up or hide it. Last verified August 2026.

That places Manchester City Football Club joint 40th of 1,023 companies scored, and joint 2nd of 22 in Professional Sports Clubs.

The ten questions

What is Manchester City Football Club doing well, and where does it fall short?

Strongest on Energy Source and Resource Use & Waste (7/10, 7/10). Weakest on Carbon Footprint: Supply Chain and Emissions Trajectory (5/10, 5/10).

What's missing

Where Manchester City Football Club lost points

For each question that lost points, the evidence our public rubric looks for that we didn't find.

What would raise this score

  • Emissions from its supply chainMeasure most of its supply-chain (Scope 3) emissions.
  • Whether its emissions are fallingShow a year-on-year fall in its total emissions.
  • Its climate targetsMake its targets science-based, or commit to the Science Based Targets initiative.

Every question that lost points

  • Emissions from its own operations6/10Its own emissions aren't independently verified or tracked over several years.
  • Emissions from its supply chain5/10Most of its supply-chain (Scope 3) emissions aren't measured.
  • Whether its emissions are falling5/10No evidence of a year-on-year fall in its total emissions.
  • How clean its energy is7/10Less than 90% of its energy shown to be renewable.
  • Its effect on nature6/10No verified restoration beyond its own footprint, or supply chain not mapped for nature risk.
  • How it uses materials and handles waste7/10No verified figures for reuse and recycling across the business.
  • Its effect on water6/10No water stewardship programme or verified fall in water use.
  • Its climate targets5/10Its targets aren't science-based or committed to the Science Based Targets initiative.
  • How openly it reports7/10No annual impact report, or no pay linked to climate targets.
  • Its record on controversies6/10Points deducted for controversies or its business model. The finding is under question 10.

A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Anyone can send us new evidence, free. How to send it.

The calculation

How is Manchester City Football Club's SINK score calculated?

Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.

SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × Scale
Industry base impact
Professional Sports Clubs sector ceiling.
45 / 100
Performance score
Sum of the ten questions, each scored 0 to 10.
60 / 100
Raw score
Weighted average before scale penalty.
(0.3 × 45) + (0.7 × 60) = 55.5
Scale penalty
Multiplier based on total emissions. Bigger polluters lose more.
× 1
Evidence basis
Which evidence path produced this score. It reflects what was publicly available, and says nothing about how much the company emits.
Primary source verified
Final score
Rounded. Making progress.
56 / 100
Where the evidence comes from

What evidence is Manchester City Football Club's score based on?

13 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which of the ten questions it informed.

31% of them were published by Manchester City Football Club itself; the rest come from independent sources.

9 of 13 sources are independent of the company.

[1]Self-reported
2025 Manchester City Sustainability Report

“Scope 1: 1,411 tCO2e; Scope 2: 1,694.6 tCO2e (location-based), 2024-25 season”

2025
Q1Q2Q3Q6Q7Q9
View →
[2]Self-reported
Manchester City Sustainability: Game Plan

“For thirteen years, we have utilised the DEFRA GHG Protocol for our emissions impact measurement”

Ongoing
Q1Q4Q5Q6Q7Q9
View →
[3]Self-reported
Manchester City Annual Report 2025 — Sustainability

“Wildlife counts reaffirmed the healthy status of the landscape and air and water qualities at the CFA, with new fauna species naturally seeding”

2025
Q5
View →
[4]Public record
Sustainable Transport and Solar: Manchester City Football Club

“Manchester City Football Club has reduced its carbon emissions by 25% across the 2024/25 season”

Unknown
Q3
View →
[5]Public record
Sustainability Beat: Manchester City

“Manchester City Football Club's overall emissions increased by 50.6% year-on-year, compared to a 31.8% reduction in the previous year”

2023
Q3
View →
[6]Public record
Manchester City Renewable Energy

“the Club purchasing 100% renewable electricity under a power agreement for the past eight years”

2024Archived copy from 2025-07-18: the original link no longer opens for us.
Q4
View →
[7]Self-reported
Manchester City and Xylem Partnership: Every Drop Counts

“City Football Academy, home to the club's 16 training pitches, now irrigates exclusively with rainwater”

Unknown
Q7
View →
[8]Public record
Manchester City Net Zero

“New Manchester City shirts now comprise 75% repurposed football jerseys and 25% SEAQUAL marine plastic”

Unknown
Q6
View →
[9]Public record
Manchester City Sustainability Leadership

“MCFC is committed to achieving net-zero emissions by 2030—five years ahead of Greater Manchester's target”

Unknown
Q8
View →
[10]Independent source
Premier League Makes Steady Progress

“In November 2024, Arsenal became the only football club in the world to have a net-zero target approved by the Science Based Targets initiative”

Unknown
Q8
View →
[11]Independent source
Sportswash: Always an Own Goal

“the 'Own Goal' award… Manchester City F.C's water bottle for air miles recycling exchange scheme took the top prize”

2022
Q10
View →
[12]Public record
Accolades and Efforts Don't Hide Sportswashing in the Premier League

“Etihad Airways (Manchester City) are significant contributors to climate change, with air travel accounting for over 2% of global greenhouse gas emissions”

Unknown
Q10
View →
[13]Independent source
Clubs, Players, Extreme Weather: Longer Seasons

“Manchester City adopt their own bespoke emissions reporting approach, not aligned with the 15 categories in the GHG protocol scope 3 standard”

Unknown
Q2
View →

If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.

For Manchester City Football Club

Is this your company? Claim this profile (free)

Free. Once you confirm, this page says “Profile claimed by Manchester City Football Club” and we email you when the score changes. Claiming changes nothing about the score. More than one person can claim a company. Privacy

  • Use this score in tenders

    Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.

    Open the score sheet →
  • Send new evidence, free

    Scored low because little is published? Publish what you do and send us the link, free. If it holds up, your score changes, and the change is logged on your page.

    How to send evidence →
  • Put your score on your website, free

    It shows the current band, sector rank and score, and links to this page, so it changes when the score does.

    Manchester City Football Club: SINK sustainability score 56.

Track this score

We'll send one email to confirm. Every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy

Bidding for a public contract? Check if you need a Carbon Reduction Plan, free →

We reply within 5 working days.

Want your own page like this?

Free, independent, every source shown. Send it to any buyer who asks about your sustainability.

Score my business free
Manchester City Football Club in context

How does Manchester City Football Club compare with other professional sports clubs companies?

Where Manchester City Football Club sits among professional sports clubs peers.

Among the 22 major professional sports clubs brands we've scored, Manchester City Football Club is tied =2nd of 22, with 2 others.

=2/22
Manchester City Football Club's rank
36
Industry average
22
Industry low
58
Industry high
See all 22 in Professional Sports Clubs →
THE SUNDAY RUNDOWN

Which companies moved this week, and why.

One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.

We'll send one email to confirm. No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

Checking a company?

Search free →

Asked to prove you're sustainable?

Get your business scored, free →

Been scored?

Find your page and claim it, free →

Scores are free. Nobody can pay to change a score, speed it up or hide it.