Landal GreenParks sustainability score: 26/100
Below expectations starts at 31. The highest score on SINK is 71.
Landal GreenParks operates more than 200 holiday parks across Europe, mainly in the Netherlands and Germany, offering vacation accommodation and leisure facilities. Founded in 1954 and headquartered in Amsterdam, it merged with Roompot in 2023 and the combined group trades as Landal.
More about Landal GreenParks
The company positions itself as an eco-conscious hospitality operator but lacks comprehensive sustainability disclosure.
Head office NetherlandsStaff Not found (no authoritative figure located)Revenue €845.2M (FY2025)Website ↗
Landal discloses only partial, unverified operational emissions (46 kt CO₂) with no Scope 3 inventory, no multi-year trajectory, and no sustainability report since 2021–2022. Heating remains fossil-fueled despite a 2030 climate-neutral pledge. A contested park development near protected nature adds reputational risk.
Landal GreenParks scores 26/100 (Significant gaps) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Scores are free. Nobody can pay to change a score, speed it up or hide it. Last verified October 2026.
That places Landal GreenParks joint 847th of 1,023 companies scored, and 16th of 16 in Hospitality / Hotels.
What is Landal GreenParks doing well, and where does it fall short?
Strongest on Controversies & Red Flags and Energy Source (7/10, 5/10). Weakest on Carbon Footprint: Supply Chain and Carbon Footprint: Operations (1/10, 2/10).
Where Landal GreenParks lost points
For each question that lost points, the evidence our public rubric looks for that we didn't find.
What would raise this score
- Emissions from its supply chainAssess where its supply-chain emissions come from.
- Emissions from its own operationsPublish emissions figures for its own operations, even an estimate from energy bills.
- Whether its emissions are fallingShow its emissions are falling, even from energy bills or mileage.
Every question that lost points
- Emissions from its own operations2/10No emissions figures for its own operations, not even an estimate from energy bills.
- Emissions from its supply chain1/10No assessment of where its supply-chain emissions come from.
- Whether its emissions are falling2/10No evidence its emissions are falling, not even from energy bills or mileage.
- How clean its energy is5/10Less than half its energy shown to be renewable, or no transition plan.
- Its effect on nature3/10No assessment of its effect on nature, and no basic environmental policy.
- How it uses materials and handles waste4/10No measurable waste or recycling targets reported publicly.
- Its effect on water3/10No monitoring of water use, or no measures to reduce it.
- Its climate targets4/10Its targets aren't science-based or committed to the Science Based Targets initiative.
- How openly it reports3/10No published sustainability data, or no one named as responsible for it.
- Its record on controversies7/10Points deducted for controversies or its business model. The finding is under question 10.
A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Anyone can send us new evidence, free. How to send it.
How is Landal GreenParks's SINK score calculated?
Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleHas Landal GreenParks's score changed?
Landal GreenParks's score has been reviewed 2 times and currently stands where it started, at 26.
- 26 → 267 November 2026
Correction, 7 November 2026: removed an unsourced emissions figure. Score unchanged.
- Scored 2612 October 2026
Initial public score 26 (publish-draft)
What evidence is Landal GreenParks's score based on?
11 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which of the ten questions it informed.
45% of them were published by Landal GreenParks itself; the rest come from independent sources.
“Landal emits around 46 kilotonnes of CO₂ annually.”
“Aim to source electricity generated from 100% renewable energy sources by 2025”
“Precies tussen twee natuurgebieden in”
“Sustainable Brand Index is Europa's grootste onafhankelijke merkenonderzoek op het gebied van duurzaamheid.”
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Is this your company? Claim this profile (free)
Use this score in tenders
Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.
Open the score sheet →Send new evidence, free
Scored low because little is published? Publish what you do and send us the link, free. If it holds up, your score changes, and the change is logged on your page.
How to send evidence →Put your score on your website, free
It shows the current band, sector rank and score, and links to this page, so it changes when the score does.
Track this score
Bidding for a public contract? Check if you need a Carbon Reduction Plan, free →
Want your own page like this?
Free, independent, every source shown. Send it to any buyer who asks about your sustainability.
How does Landal GreenParks compare with other hospitality / hotels companies?
Landal GreenParks sits at the bottom of the hospitality / hotels pack.
Among the 16 major hospitality / hotels brands we've scored, Landal GreenParks sits 16th of 16.
Who scores higher in Hospitality / Hotels?
The 3 companies in the sector scoring nearest above Landal GreenParks.
PureGym reports basic Scope 1&2 emissions but ignores major Scope 3 categories, masking true supply chain impact.
See the breakdown →Exclusive Collection's own emissions fell from 2,322 to 1,207 tCO2e in two years on a market basis, helped by a certificate-backed green electricity tariff, but gas is still about 38% of its energy and it does not count the food and drink it buys.
See the breakdown →Marriott has SBTi-validated net-zero targets but is actively missing annual reduction milestones.
See the breakdown →Which companies moved this week, and why.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
We'll send one email to confirm. No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Checking a company?
Search free →Asked to prove you're sustainable?
Get your business scored, free →Been scored?
Find your page and claim it, free →Scores are free. Nobody can pay to change a score, speed it up or hide it.