Better than 52% of Food Service / Restaurants
Making progress starts at 46. The highest score on SINK is 71.
Compass Group is a UK-headquartered foodservice and facilities management company operating in 26 countries, serving millions of meals daily through contract catering, vending, and support services to corporate, education, healthcare, and defence sectors. It is a FTSE 100 company and one of the world's largest foodservice operators by revenue.
Head office GBStaff ~580,000Revenue ~$42BWebsite ↗
Compass Group reports Scope 1&2 emissions with KPMG-verified data but absolute emissions rose 6% in FY2024. Scope 3 coverage is narrow (food commodities only, 1 of 15 categories) with unreliable baseline comparisons due to methodology changes. Absolute emissions trajectory is worsening despite intensity improvements. Water consumption remains unreported at Group level despite materiality.
Compass scores 34/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Scores are free. Nobody can pay to change a score, speed it up or hide it. Last verified October 2026.
That places Compass joint 598th of 1,023 companies scored, and joint 25th of 53 in Food Service / Restaurants.
Strongest on Controversies & Red Flags and Carbon Footprint: Operations (8/10, 7/10). Weakest on Emissions Trajectory and Water Impact (2/10, 3/10).
For each question that lost points, the evidence our public rubric looks for that we didn't find.
What would raise this score
Every question that lost points
A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Anyone can send us new evidence, free. How to send it.
Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleCompass's score has moved from 37 to 34 across 2 recorded reviews, down 3 points.
Aggregator-citation sweep: broker citations replaced with the primary disclosures they mirror, re-scored through the guarded pipeline under pinned code 9196601.
Initial public score 37 (publish-draft)
16 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which of the ten questions it informed.
75% of them were published by Compass itself; the rest come from independent sources.
“Compass Group calculates Scope 1 and 2 emissions in accordance with The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard”
“KPMG LLP provided independent limited assurance, using assurance standards ISAE(UK)3000 and ISAE3410, over selected ESG data points”
“Whilst the Group's absolute Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions increased year on year due to new business wins”
“Approximately 98% of Compass Group's GHG emissions are Scope 3”
“Whilst the Group's absolute Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions increased year on year due to new business wins”
“our absolute Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions have increased 6% year-on-year”
“Compass Group UK & Ireland has confirmed that it is sourcing 100% renewable electricity, up from just 2% in 2019”
“From January 2022, Compass Group France switched to using 100% renewable energy in their direct operations”
“We recognise that agriculture and food supply continue to be a key driver of deforestation and the degradation of our natural environment”
“Water stewardship: embedding water-stewardship criteria into procurement processes and decision-making for high water-risk commodities”
“GHG intensity ratio by 11 percent compared to 2024, with a 2 percent absolute emissions reduction”
“46% reduction in absolute Scope 1 & 2 GHG emissions by 2030 / 28% reduction in absolute Scope 3 GHG emissions... SBTi validated science-based interim targets for 2030”
“ambitious emissions reduction targets over the next decade which have been validated by the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi)”
“Over 10,000 sites recording food waste”
“Compass provided a clear, detailed position on climate change science and how the land-use sector contributes to it”
“Water consumption & quality listed as a material issue”
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Use this score in tenders
Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.
Open the score sheet →Send new evidence, free
Scored low because little is published? Publish what you do and send us the link, free. If it holds up, your score changes, and the change is logged on your page.
How to send evidence →Put your score on your website, free
It shows the current band, sector rank and score, and links to this page, so it changes when the score does.
Track this score
Bidding for a public contract? Check if you need a Carbon Reduction Plan, free →
Free, independent, every source shown. Send it to any buyer who asks about your sustainability.
Where Compass sits among food service / restaurants peers.
Among the 53 major food service / restaurants brands we've scored, Compass is tied =25th of 53, with 1 other.
The 3 companies in the sector scoring nearest above Compass.
Mitchells & Butlers reports carbon and waste metrics but lacks third-party verification and detailed disclosure on water, nature, and supply-chain emissions.
See the breakdown →Tortilla Mexican Grill has published minimal sustainability data since its 2022 ESG report.
See the breakdown →Honest Burgers has built a genuine supply chain intervention around regenerative beef but shields itself behind unverified claims.
See the breakdown →One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
We'll send one email to confirm. No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Checking a company?
Search free →Asked to prove you're sustainable?
Get your business scored, free →Been scored?
Find your page and claim it, free →Scores are free. Nobody can pay to change a score, speed it up or hide it.