Christian Dior sustainability score: 35/100
Making progress starts at 46. The highest score on SINK is 71.
Christian Dior is a French luxury fashion house founded in 1946, headquartered in Paris. Specialising in haute couture, ready-to-wear, accessories, and fragrances, Dior is owned by LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE.
More about Christian Dior
The brand generates significant revenue from leather goods, textiles, and beauty products distributed globally.
Founded 1946Head office Paris, FranceStaff ~215,000 (LVMH Group, 2024)Revenue ~€84.7B (Christian Dior SE Group, 2024)Website ↗
Dior operates under LVMH's sustainability umbrella with partial emissions disclosure and regressing Scope 3 transparency. Leather supply chains link to Amazon deforestation; water stress unaddressed at brand level. Regulatory actions in Italy expose labour exploitation in contracted manufacturing and misleading sustainability claims.
Christian Dior scores 35/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Scores are free. Nobody can pay to change a score, speed it up or hide it. Last verified May 2026.
That places Christian Dior joint 572nd of 1,023 companies scored, and joint 35th of 57 in FMCG / Consumer Goods.
What is Christian Dior doing well, and where does it fall short?
Strongest on Energy Source and Carbon Footprint: Operations (6/10, 5/10). Weakest on Carbon Footprint: Supply Chain and Nature & Biodiversity Impact (3/10, 3/10).
Where Christian Dior lost points
For each question that lost points, the evidence our public rubric looks for that we didn't find.
What would raise this score
- Emissions from its supply chainAssess where its supply-chain emissions come from.
- Its effect on natureAssess its effect on nature and publish a basic environmental policy.
- Its effect on waterMonitor its water use and take measures to reduce it.
Every question that lost points
- Emissions from its own operations5/10No full Scope 1 and 2 figures worked out to the GHG Protocol.
- Emissions from its supply chain3/10No assessment of where its supply-chain emissions come from.
- Whether its emissions are falling4/10No evidence of a year-on-year fall in its total emissions.
- How clean its energy is6/10Less than 90% of its energy shown to be renewable.
- Its effect on nature3/10No assessment of its effect on nature, and no basic environmental policy.
- How it uses materials and handles waste4/10No measurable waste or recycling targets reported publicly.
- Its effect on water3/10No monitoring of water use, or no measures to reduce it.
- Its climate targets5/10Its targets aren't science-based or committed to the Science Based Targets initiative.
- How openly it reports4/10No dedicated sustainability role, board oversight or public report.
- Its record on controversies3/10Points deducted for controversies or its business model. The finding is under question 10.
A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Anyone can send us new evidence, free. How to send it.
How is Christian Dior's SINK score calculated?
Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleWhat evidence is Christian Dior's score based on?
12 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which of the ten questions it informed.
25% of them were published by Christian Dior itself; the rest come from independent sources.
Scored on 9 April 2026 under an earlier version of our method. We're re-checking it under the current method.
9 of 12 sources are independent of the company.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Is this your company? Claim this profile (free)
Use this score in tenders
Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.
Open the score sheet →Send new evidence, free
Scored low because little is published? Publish what you do and send us the link, free. If it holds up, your score changes, and the change is logged on your page.
How to send evidence →Put your score on your website, free
It shows the current band, sector rank and score, and links to this page, so it changes when the score does.
Track this score
Bidding for a public contract? Check if you need a Carbon Reduction Plan, free →
Want your own page like this?
Free, independent, every source shown. Send it to any buyer who asks about your sustainability.
How does Christian Dior compare with other fmcg / consumer goods companies?
Where Christian Dior sits among fmcg / consumer goods peers.
Among the 57 major fmcg / consumer goods brands we've scored, Christian Dior is tied =35th of 57, with 1 other.
Who scores higher in FMCG / Consumer Goods?
The 3 companies in the sector scoring nearest above Christian Dior.
Montblanc hides behind Richemont's group reporting, publishing no brand-level emissions, water, or nature data.
See the breakdown →Mars has cut absolute emissions 16% since 2015 while growing revenue 69%, with SBTi-validated targets and strong supply chain mapping.
See the breakdown →Green People is a 30-person cosmetics manufacturer with a clean ethical record but almost no measured environmental data.
See the breakdown →Which companies moved this week, and why.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
We'll send one email to confirm. No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Checking a company?
Search free →Asked to prove you're sustainable?
Get your business scored, free →Been scored?
Find your page and claim it, free →Scores are free. Nobody can pay to change a score, speed it up or hide it.