Bulgari sustainability score: 32/100
Making progress starts at 46. The highest score on SINK is 71.
Bulgari is a luxury jewellery, watches, and perfume house founded in Rome in 1884 and now owned by LVMH. The brand operates ~5,600 employees globally across manufacturing, retail, and craft operations, with significant exposure to precious metals and gemstone supply chains.
Founded 1884Head office Rome, ItalyStaff ~5,600Revenue ~€2.5B (estimated, consolidated global operations)Website ↗
Bulgari discloses almost no standalone environmental data, relying entirely on LVMH group reporting that obscures brand-level impact. No verified Scope 3 inventory exists. Operational emissions likely modest but unquantified; supply chain risks in gold and diamonds are acknowledged but unmonitored. Intensity-based targets and trade association misalignment on climate policy are structural weaknesses.
Bulgari scores 32/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Scores are free. Nobody can pay to change a score, speed it up or hide it. Last verified May 2026.
That places Bulgari joint 658th of 1,023 companies scored, and 39th of 57 in FMCG / Consumer Goods.
What is Bulgari doing well, and where does it fall short?
Strongest on Controversies & Red Flags and Energy Source (6/10, 5/10). Weakest on Carbon Footprint: Supply Chain and Carbon Footprint: Operations (2/10, 3/10).
Where Bulgari lost points
For each question that lost points, the evidence our public rubric looks for that we didn't find.
What would raise this score
- Emissions from its supply chainAssess where its supply-chain emissions come from.
- Emissions from its own operationsPublish emissions figures for its own operations, even an estimate from energy bills.
- Whether its emissions are fallingShow its emissions are falling, even from energy bills or mileage.
Every question that lost points
- Emissions from its own operations3/10No emissions figures for its own operations, not even an estimate from energy bills.
- Emissions from its supply chain2/10No assessment of where its supply-chain emissions come from.
- Whether its emissions are falling3/10No evidence its emissions are falling, not even from energy bills or mileage.
- How clean its energy is5/10Less than half its energy shown to be renewable, or no transition plan.
- Its effect on nature3/10No assessment of its effect on nature, and no basic environmental policy.
- How it uses materials and handles waste3/10No active waste reduction, reuse or repair shown.
- Its effect on water3/10No monitoring of water use, or no measures to reduce it.
- Its climate targets4/10Its targets aren't science-based or committed to the Science Based Targets initiative.
- How openly it reports4/10No dedicated sustainability role, board oversight or public report.
- Its record on controversies6/10Points deducted for controversies or its business model. The finding is under question 10.
A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Anyone can send us new evidence, free. How to send it.
How is Bulgari's SINK score calculated?
Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleHas Bulgari's score changed?
Bulgari's score has been reviewed 2 times and currently stands where it started, at 32.
- 32 → 327 November 2026
Correction, 7 November 2026: removed an unsourced emissions figure. Score unchanged.
- Scored 329 April 2026
Initial score at platform launch
What evidence is Bulgari's score based on?
10 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which of the ten questions it informed.
30% of them were published by Bulgari itself; the rest come from independent sources.
Scored on 9 April 2026 under an earlier version of our method. We're re-checking it under the current method.
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Is this your company? Claim this profile (free)
Use this score in tenders
Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.
Open the score sheet →Send new evidence, free
Scored low because little is published? Publish what you do and send us the link, free. If it holds up, your score changes, and the change is logged on your page.
How to send evidence →Put your score on your website, free
It shows the current band, sector rank and score, and links to this page, so it changes when the score does.
Track this score
Bidding for a public contract? Check if you need a Carbon Reduction Plan, free →
Want your own page like this?
Free, independent, every source shown. Send it to any buyer who asks about your sustainability.
How does Bulgari compare with other fmcg / consumer goods companies?
Where Bulgari sits among fmcg / consumer goods peers.
Among the 57 major fmcg / consumer goods brands we've scored, Bulgari sits 39th of 57.
Who scores higher in FMCG / Consumer Goods?
The 3 companies in the sector scoring nearest above Bulgari.
Church & Dwight reports Scope 1+2 data with SBTi validation but delivers flat emissions, not reductions.
See the breakdown →Van Cleef & Arpels hides behind Richemont's group-level reporting with no brand-specific sustainability disclosure.
See the breakdown →Reckitt has eliminated 69% of operational emissions since 2015, surpassing its near-term target.
See the breakdown →Which companies moved this week, and why.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
We'll send one email to confirm. No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Checking a company?
Search free →Asked to prove you're sustainable?
Get your business scored, free →Been scored?
Find your page and claim it, free →Scores are free. Nobody can pay to change a score, speed it up or hide it.