3M Company sustainability score: 32/100
Making progress starts at 46. The highest score on SINK is 71.
3M Company is a diversified manufacturer headquartered in St. Paul, Minnesota. Reincorporated in Delaware in 1929.
More about 3M Company
It makes industrial and consumer materials and products, including abrasives, adhesives and tapes, films, safety equipment and electronics materials. It reported $24.9 billion in revenue for FY2025 and about 60,500 employees. It spun off its health-care business, Solventum, in April 2024 and ended PFAS manufacturing at the end of 2025.
Founded 1902Head office St. Paul, Minnesota, USStaff ~60,500 (FY2025)Revenue US$24,948M net sales (FY2025)Website ↗
3M publishes assured Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions. Its Scope 1 and 2 are 64% below 2019, and its Scope 3 of 21.4 million tonnes comes mostly from the use of its sold products. About 65% of its electricity is renewable, but most of its energy is still fossil fuel. It has settled PFAS pollution claims with the Flemish Government and New Jersey, carries $7.7 billion of environmental liabilities, mostly PFAS-related, and its landfill waste has risen since 2023.
3M Company scores 32/100 (Below expectations) on SINK's independent climate assessment, scored from public data only. Scores are free. Nobody can pay to change a score, speed it up or hide it. Last verified November 2026.
That places 3M Company joint 658th of 1,023 companies scored, and 10th of 17 in Chemicals.
What is 3M Company doing well, and where does it fall short?
Strongest on Carbon Footprint: Operations and Targets & Commitments (8/10, 8/10). Weakest on Controversies & Red Flags and Nature & Biodiversity Impact (1/10, 3/10).
Where 3M Company lost points
For each question that lost points, the evidence our public rubric looks for that we didn't find.
What would raise this score
- Its record on controversiesDeal with the findings under question 10, in public.
- Its effect on natureAssess its effect on nature and publish a basic environmental policy.
- Its effect on waterMeasure its water footprint and set reduction targets.
Every question that lost points
- Emissions from its own operations8/10No verified figures published with their method and a falling trend.
- Emissions from its supply chain7/10No full value-chain map or supplier engagement programme.
- Whether its emissions are falling7/10No consistent fall over several years across its operations and supply chain.
- How clean its energy is5/10Less than half its energy shown to be renewable, or no transition plan.
- Its effect on nature3/10No assessment of its effect on nature, and no basic environmental policy.
- How it uses materials and handles waste5/10No measurable waste or recycling targets reported publicly.
- Its effect on water4/10No measured water footprint with reduction targets.
- Its climate targets8/10No validated long-term net zero target.
- How openly it reports6/10No annual impact report, or no pay linked to climate targets.
- Its record on controversies1/10Points deducted for controversies or its business model. The finding is under question 10.
A score changes when the evidence does. We use new published evidence at the next rescore. Anyone can send us new evidence, free. How to send it.
How is 3M Company's SINK score calculated?
Same ten questions for every company. No private weighting.
SINK = (0.3 × Base + 0.7 × Performance) × ScaleHas 3M Company's score changed?
3M Company's score has moved from 38 to 32 across 2 recorded reviews, down 6 points.
- 38 → 32-64 November 2026
owner 2026-11-04: re-scored v2.5 as Chemicals (no majority segment; sector exception PR #189); 38→32. Q10 −5 on the paid Flanders PFAS settlement, New Jersey kept as context; −2 LobbyMap memberships; founded stays 1902 (1929 Delaware reincorporation = redomicile)
- Scored 3811 April 2026
Initial score at platform launch
What evidence is 3M Company's score based on?
15 sources used in this assessment. All publicly available. Each row shows which of the ten questions it informed.
33% of them were published by 3M Company itself; the rest come from independent sources.
10 of 15 sources are independent of the company.
“Base year 2019, 5,160,000 metric tons CO”
“independent third-party assurance process.”
“all categories of scope 3 emissions have been third party assured”
“3M completed its exit of PFAS manufacturing at the end of 2025.”
“Free of deforestation and degradation, meaning not from areas where natural forests are being converted to other land uses or plantations after March 5, 2015.”
“3M is als vervuiler verantwoordelijk voor het onderzoek en de sanering van de PFAS-verontreiniging.”
“調査事例（3M）：PFASの排出により、多額の賠償責任”
“its near-term emissions reduction goals have been validated by the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi)”
“3M has not published a review of its alignment with its industry associations.”
“3M will pay a total of $400 million to $450 million”
“3M agreed to pay up $450 million to resolve lawsuits over natural resource contamination stemming from PFAS”
“The Flemish government had ordered 3M to halt PFAS production at Zwijndrecht last October because of contamination levels.”
“De gemeente Zwijndrecht krijgt de komende jaren 15 miljoen euro van multinational 3M voor de PFAS-vervuiling.”
If you believe a source has been misread or a newer version exists, submit a challenge.
Is this your company? Claim this profile (free)
Use this score in tenders
Send the link, or the one-page score sheet. It links back to this page and every source. Free.
Open the score sheet →Send new evidence, free
Scored low because little is published? Publish what you do and send us the link, free. If it holds up, your score changes, and the change is logged on your page.
How to send evidence →Put your score on your website, free
It shows the current band, sector rank and score, and links to this page, so it changes when the score does.
Track this score
Bidding for a public contract? Check if you need a Carbon Reduction Plan, free →
Want your own page like this?
Free, independent, every source shown. Send it to any buyer who asks about your sustainability.
How does 3M Company compare with other chemicals companies?
Where 3M Company sits among chemicals peers.
Among the 17 major chemicals brands we've scored, 3M Company sits 10th of 17.
Who scores higher in Chemicals?
The 3 companies in the sector scoring nearest above 3M Company.
AkzoNobel has cut its own emissions 47% since 2018 and its total footprint from 14.9 to 12.2 MtCO2e, but value-chain emissions are down only 19%.
See the breakdown →dsm-firmenich's total emissions fell to 11.0 MtCO2e in 2025, but the company says much of its progress came from the Animal Nutrition & Health business it is selling, and it publishes no figures for the rest of the group alone.
See the breakdown →Symrise's total emissions rose 38.5% in 2025 to 3.5 MtCO2e, with supply-chain emissions up 40.6% after rising 15% the year before.
See the breakdown →Which companies moved this week, and why.
One email, every Sunday. Score changes, new research, the stories behind the numbers. Free.
We'll send one email to confirm. No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.
Checking a company?
Search free →Asked to prove you're sustainable?
Get your business scored, free →Been scored?
Find your page and claim it, free →Scores are free. Nobody can pay to change a score, speed it up or hide it.